.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the SaaS world, metrics drive decisions. Among the most critical KPIs that executives monitor are Customer Lifetime Value to Customer Acquisition Cost ratio (LTV-CAC) and Payback Period. These two metrics often compete for attention in boardroom discussions and strategic planning sessions. But which one deserves top priority? This article examines both metrics and provides guidance on when to focus on each one based on your company's growth stage and objectives.
Understanding the Fundamentals
LTV-CAC Ratio
The LTV-CAC ratio measures the relationship between how much value a customer brings throughout their relationship with your company versus how much it costs to acquire them.
The formula:
LTV-CAC Ratio = Customer Lifetime Value / Customer Acquisition Cost
A healthy SaaS business typically aims for an LTV-CAC ratio of 3:1 or higher. According to data from OpenView Partners, top-performing SaaS companies often maintain ratios of 4:1 or better.
Payback Period
Payback Period measures how long it takes to recover the cost invested in acquiring a customer.
The formula:
Payback Period = Customer Acquisition Cost / Monthly Recurring Revenue per Customer
Industry benchmarks suggest that a healthy payback period is 12 months or less. According to Bessemer Venture Partners' State of the Cloud report, elite SaaS companies achieve payback periods of 5-7 months.
When to Prioritize LTV-CAC
1. During Scaling Phases
When your SaaS company has established product-market fit and is looking to scale, LTV-CAC becomes particularly important. A study by ProfitWell found that companies with LTV-CAC ratios above 3 grow at rates 20% faster than those with lower ratios during scaling phases.
2. For Investor Relations
Investors typically place high importance on LTV-CAC ratios when evaluating SaaS companies. According to SaaS Capital, companies with LTV-CAC ratios above 3 command valuation multiples 2-4x higher than those with ratios below 2.
3. For Long-Term Strategic Planning
When making decisions about entering new markets or developing new products, LTV-CAC provides a north star for long-term sustainability. It helps answer the fundamental question: "Is this business model economically viable over time?"
When to Prioritize Payback Period
1. During Cash-Constrained Periods
If your SaaS business is operating under tight cash flow constraints, payback period becomes critical. A Crunchbase analysis of SaaS startups that failed during 2018-2020 found that 40% of these companies had payback periods exceeding 18 months.
2. In Highly Competitive Markets
In markets with intense competition and rapid change, prioritizing payback period helps ensure your business can quickly recover investment before market conditions shift. A McKinsey study found that SaaS companies in fast-evolving sectors benefit from focusing on shortening payback periods to maintain competitive agility.
3. For Operational Efficiency Improvements
When optimizing your sales and marketing operations, payback period provides more immediate feedback than LTV-CAC. Improvements to payback period typically manifest in financial reports more quickly, allowing for faster iteration cycles.
Finding the Right Balance
The reality is that both metrics matter, but their relative importance shifts based on your company's circumstances.
Early-Stage Startups
For early-stage SaaS companies, Tomasz Tunguz of Redpoint Ventures suggests prioritizing payback period initially. According to his research, startups with payback periods under 12 months are 2.5x more likely to reach Series B funding than those with longer periods.
Growth-Stage Companies
As companies mature, shifting focus toward LTV-CAC becomes more beneficial. Data from Pacific Crest's SaaS Survey shows that companies growing at 40%+ year-over-year tend to allocate more resources to improving LTV-CAC rather than shortening payback periods.
Public SaaS Companies
For public SaaS companies, both metrics are watched closely by analysts. However, Gainsight's research indicates that public SaaS companies that consistently communicate and improve their LTV-CAC ratios tend to trade at higher revenue multiples than those that focus primarily on payback periods.
Practical Approach: The Hybrid Framework
Rather than choosing one metric over the other entirely, many successful SaaS executives adopt a hybrid approach:
Set minimum thresholds for both metrics - For example, maintain a payback period under 12 months AND an LTV-CAC ratio above 3:1.
Adjust focus based on business cycles - During fundraising, emphasize LTV-CAC; during efficiency drives, prioritize payback period.
Segment by customer types - According to research from Insight Partners, enterprise SaaS companies often benefit from accepting longer payback periods for enterprise clients (due to significantly higher LTV), while maintaining stricter payback requirements for SMB customers.
Case Study: Zoom vs. Slack
Examining two successful SaaS companies reveals different approaches to these metrics:
Zoom prioritized payback period early on, achieving a remarkably short 7-month payback period before its IPO, according to their S-1 filing. This focus on efficient customer acquisition fueled their ability to grow while maintaining profitability.
Slack, by contrast, accepted longer payback periods (estimated at 15-18 months) but focused on building exceptional LTV-CAC ratios through best-in-class retention and expansion revenue. Their approach enabled them to justify greater upfront investment in customer acquisition.
Both companies succeeded with different priorities, demonstrating there's no one-size-fits-all answer.
Conclusion: Strategic Context Matters Most
The answer to whether you should prioritize LTV-CAC or payback period isn't absolute—it depends on your strategic context. Consider these factors when making your decision:
- Cash position and runway
- Growth expectations (from investors and management)
- Competitive landscape
- Customer acquisition channels and their stability
- Customer retention trends
The most successful SaaS companies don't blindly adhere to one metric at the expense of the other. Instead, they understand how these metrics interact and shift their focus accordingly as business conditions evolve.
In the words of David Skok, renowned SaaS investor: "The best SaaS companies manage both metrics in tandem, optimizing for payback in the short term while building toward excellent LTV-CAC economics in the long term."
What's your current priority? The answer should reflect your company's unique position and ambitions in today's dynamic SaaS landscape.