
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's data-driven business landscape, workflow orchestration tools have become essential for automating complex business processes. However, when evaluating these solutions, many organizations overlook a critical factor that can significantly impact their budget: the pricing model. Specifically, are you being charged per workflow or per execution? This distinction can mean the difference between predictable costs and unexpected budget overruns.
Workflow orchestration tools typically follow one of two pricing approaches, each with distinct implications for your organization's bottom line:
Under this model, you're charged based on the number of workflows you create and maintain within the system. This approach:
According to a recent Gartner analysis, workflow-based pricing is prevalent among legacy enterprise automation platforms that evolved from BPM (Business Process Management) solutions.
This increasingly common model charges you for each instance a workflow runs. Key characteristics include:
"Execution-based pricing has become the standard among cloud-native orchestration tools," notes VC firm Andreessen Horowitz in their Enterprise Automation Market report. "This creates alignment with cloud consumption models but requires vigilant monitoring."
To understand the practical impact of these pricing approaches, consider this example:
A mid-sized financial services company implemented a customer onboarding automation workflow. Under a workflow-based pricing model, they paid $2,000 monthly for unlimited executions. When they switched to a vendor using execution-based pricing at $0.05 per run, their monthly costs looked reasonable for their projected 20,000 executions ($1,000).
However, when a successful marketing campaign quadrupled their new customer applications, their orchestration costs unexpectedly jumped to $4,000 monthly—exactly when scaling should have delivered cost efficiencies.
The optimal pricing structure depends heavily on your specific automation needs:
Beyond the basic pricing model, several factors can significantly influence your total cost of ownership:
Definition of an "execution": Does the vendor count each step in a workflow as a separate execution, or is the entire workflow counted as one?
Data transfer and storage costs: Some providers charge separately for data moving through or stored within workflows.
Integration fees: Connections to third-party systems might incur additional charges.
Support and SLA tiers: Enterprise-grade support often comes at a premium.
High-availability and disaster recovery options: Redundancy features typically increase costs.
When evaluating workflow orchestration tools, consider asking:
The automation pricing model that works best ultimately depends on your specific use cases, execution patterns, and budget constraints. Organizations with high-volume, mission-critical processes may benefit from the predictability of workflow-based pricing, while those with variable or developing automation needs might prefer the flexibility of execution-based approaches.
What's most important is understanding the long-term cost implications of your choice. As workflow automation becomes increasingly central to business operations, selecting the right pricing model isn't just an IT decision—it's a strategic business consideration that can significantly impact your automation ROI.
Before committing to any orchestration tool, run detailed cost projections based on your actual expected usage patterns, and consider how costs will scale as your automation initiatives mature and expand throughout your organization.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.