.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's digital landscape, website performance and availability directly impact your bottom line. When your applications lag or go down, revenue and reputation suffer. This is why synthetic monitoring has become essential for proactive issue detection, but many organizations don't realize they're overpaying due to an outdated pricing model: check frequency-based billing.
The Hidden Cost Structure of Traditional Synthetic Monitoring
Most synthetic monitoring tools, particularly those focused on uptime monitoring, structure their pricing around how frequently you check your endpoints. This "check-based pricing" model means you pay more for increased monitoring frequency - creating a problematic choice between comprehensive coverage and budget constraints.
When a provider charges per check, running tests every minute instead of every five minutes increases your costs five-fold. This pricing approach creates a perverse incentive: monitor less frequently to save money, potentially missing critical issues during those monitoring gaps.
According to a 2023 report by DevOps Research Associates, organizations using check-based pricing models typically compromise by reducing monitoring frequency, resulting in an average of 43 minutes longer mean time to detection (MTTD) for critical issues.
The Real-World Impact of Check-Based Pricing
Consider this scenario: You operate an e-commerce platform generating $10,000 per hour. With checks running every five minutes to control costs, an outage could go undetected for up to five minutes. That potential five-minute detection delay translates to approximately $833 in lost revenue before you're even aware of the problem.
"The true cost of synthetic monitoring isn't the tool itself but the business impact of delayed issue detection," explains Sarah Chen, CTO at RetailTech Solutions. "When monitoring costs scale with frequency, companies inevitably make compromises that affect their incident response capabilities."
Alternative Pricing Models Emerging
The good news is that the monitoring industry is evolving. Modern synthetic monitoring solutions are shifting toward more customer-friendly pricing structures:
Transaction-based pricing: You pay based on the actual number of synthetic transactions, regardless of frequency
User journey-based pricing: Billing based on the number and complexity of user flows tested
Flat-rate monitoring: Unlimited checks for a set number of endpoints
Value-based pricing: Cost tied to the business value of the monitored applications
According to Gartner's latest IT Operations Management report, organizations that switched from check-based to alternative pricing models increased their monitoring frequency by an average of 3x without budget increases.
How to Evaluate Your Current Monitoring Costs
To determine if you're overpaying for synthetic monitoring:
Calculate your effective per-check cost: Divide your monthly bill by the total number of checks performed
Estimate the "monitoring gap cost": What would downtime during your current check intervals potentially cost your business?
Compare pricing models: Request quotes from providers with alternative pricing structures
Consider value beyond uptime: Modern synthetic monitoring tools offer more than basic availability checks, including performance analytics and user experience insights
Making the Switch: What to Look For
If you determine your current synthetic monitoring tool is using check-based pricing that limits your monitoring strategy, consider these factors when evaluating alternatives:
- Pricing transparency: Clear documentation of how costs scale with usage
- Monitoring capabilities: Browser-based testing, API monitoring, and real user monitoring integration
- Global coverage: Diverse testing locations to monitor performance worldwide
- Alert intelligence: Smart notifications that reduce alert fatigue
- Integration ecosystem: Connections to your incident management workflows
Conclusion
Check-based pricing for synthetic monitoring creates an unnecessary tradeoff between comprehensive coverage and cost management. By understanding your current pricing model and exploring alternatives, you can implement more frequent monitoring without breaking the budget.
As digital experience becomes increasingly crucial to business success, the ability to detect issues quickly and accurately becomes non-negotiable. Don't let outdated pricing models compromise your monitoring strategy and leave your business vulnerable to undetected performance issues.
Take time to review your current synthetic monitoring solution and determine if check-based pricing is limiting your observability. Your customers—and your revenue—will thank you for the improved digital experience that comes from more comprehensive monitoring.