Is Your Build Minute Pricing Model Clear to Developer Customers?

November 8, 2025

Get Started with Pricing Strategy Consulting

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Is Your Build Minute Pricing Model Clear to Developer Customers?

In the fast-paced world of software development, CI/CD platforms have become essential infrastructure. Yet one aspect often creates friction between providers and their developer customers: pricing. Specifically, build minute pricing models frequently leave developers confused and companies frustrated with unexpected bills. Let's explore why pricing clarity matters and how to improve your approach to build minutes billing.

The Growing Confusion Around Build Minute Pricing

According to a 2023 survey by SlashData, over 67% of developers report being confused by their CI/CD platform's pricing structure. This confusion typically centers around how build minutes are calculated, tracked, and billed.

The problem is understandable: build processes vary dramatically across projects. A simple website might compile in seconds, while complex applications with extensive test suites might run for hours. When developers don't clearly understand how these minutes accumulate and affect billing, trust erodes quickly.

Common Pain Points in CI/CD Pricing Transparency

1. Unclear Definition of a "Build Minute"

Different providers define build minutes differently. Some count:

  • Wall clock time (actual elapsed time)
  • CPU time (processing time used)
  • Multipliers based on machine specifications
  • Different rates for different steps in the pipeline

According to DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA), this inconsistency across providers is the number one source of billing confusion.

2. Hidden Multipliers

Many providers use machine-based multipliers that significantly impact billing:

Actual minutes × Machine multiplier = Billed minutes

For example, a 10-minute build on a 2x machine might cost 20 build minutes. If developers don't understand these multipliers, their estimated costs can be wildly inaccurate.

3. Lack of Real-Time Usage Visibility

Without clear dashboards showing current usage, teams often exceed budgets before realizing it. A Gartner report found that 72% of companies experienced at least one unexpected overage in their CI/CD costs in 2022.

Building Billing Transparency Into Your Platform

Create Clear Documentation

Your documentation should answer these questions upfront:

  • How exactly do you define and calculate a build minute?
  • What machine configurations are available and what are their multipliers?
  • Are there different rates for different operations (builds vs. tests)?
  • Are there any operations that don't count toward minutes?

CircleCI provides an excellent example with their resource class documentation, clearly outlining what each configuration costs in terms of credits.

Implement Usage Dashboards and Alerts

GitLab's approach offers a good model. Their system provides:

  • Real-time usage statistics
  • Projected monthly costs based on current usage
  • Configurable alerts when approaching defined thresholds
  • Historical usage patterns to identify inefficient workflows

Offer Usage Simulation Tools

Consider providing calculators that help customers estimate costs based on their specific workflows. GitHub Actions offers a cost calculator that allows teams to estimate expenses based on their typical workflow patterns and frequency.

Be Transparent About Changes

When JFrog changed their build minute calculation methodology in 2022, they provided a three-month notice period with side-by-side billing comparisons, helping customers adapt to the new model gradually.

The Business Case for Pricing Clarity

Billing transparency isn't just good for developers—it's good business for CI/CD providers:

  1. Reduced Customer Support Load: CloudBees reported a 43% reduction in billing-related support tickets after revamping their pricing documentation.

  2. Higher Customer Retention: According to Forrester Research, platforms with transparent pricing models see 18% higher customer retention rates.

  3. Competitive Advantage: In a crowded CI/CD market, billing transparency can be a significant differentiator.

  4. Improved Resource Planning: When customers understand billing, they optimize their workflows more efficiently.

Best Practices for Communicating Your Build Minute Pricing

  1. Create a dedicated pricing page that explains your build minute calculation in simple terms with concrete examples.

  2. Provide usage estimators that allow prospects to calculate potential costs before committing.

  3. Include explanations in invoices that break down how minutes were consumed across projects and teams.

  4. Offer optimization guides that help customers reduce their build minute consumption.

  5. Maintain a changelog for any modifications to your pricing structure.

Conclusion: Transparency Builds Trust

In the competitive CI/CD landscape, pricing clarity isn't optional—it's essential. Developers increasingly choose platforms not just for their technical capabilities but also for their billing transparency. By clearly communicating how your build minute pricing works, you build trust with your developer customers and create a foundation for long-term relationships.

The most successful CI/CD providers recognize that transparent pricing isn't just about avoiding confusion—it's about empowering developers to make informed decisions about their infrastructure costs. When developers fully understand how their actions affect billing, they become more efficient users of your platform.

Is your build minute pricing model truly clear to developers? If you're not certain, it's time to reevaluate how you communicate your pricing structure.

Get Started with Pricing Strategy Consulting

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.