
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In the world of software development, artifact storage is a critical component of any CI/CD pipeline. These artifacts—build outputs, container images, and deployment packages—need reliable storage solutions. Amazon S3 has long been the standard benchmark for cloud storage pricing, but is your current artifact storage solution priced competitively? Let's analyze what fair pricing looks like in today's market.
Amazon S3 employs a tiered pricing structure that many providers use as their reference point. The standard S3 pricing includes:
According to a 2023 report by Flexera, organizations waste approximately 32% of their cloud spend, with storage often being a significant contributor. This makes understanding your storage pricing structure essential.
When evaluating your artifact storage solution against S3, watch for these potential pricing disparities:
Many artifact storage providers advertise competitive GB/month rates but hide significant egress fees. While S3 clearly separates storage and transfer costs, some providers bundle these together in ways that obscure the total expense.
For example, a CI/CD platform might offer storage at $0.019 per GB/month—seemingly cheaper than S3—but charge $0.12 per GB for downloads, which exceeds S3's rates.
Artifact repositories typically require frequent API calls for uploads, downloads, and metadata operations. These costs can add up quickly:
For a busy CI/CD pipeline generating thousands of artifacts daily, this difference becomes substantial over time.
S3 prorates storage to the nearest hour, but some artifact storage providers:
If your workflow involves short-lived artifacts, these differences can significantly impact costs.
To determine if you're paying a fair price for artifact storage compared to S3, follow these steps:
Compare equivalent scenarios:
For example, with 500GB of artifacts, 10TB monthly transfers, and 5 million API calls:
| Cost Component | S3 (Standard) | Provider X | Provider Y |
|----------------|---------------|------------|------------|
| Storage | $11.50 | $9.50 | $15.00 |
| Transfer | $102.40 | $150.00 | $89.00 |
| API Requests | $25.00 | $45.00 | $22.00 |
| Total | $138.90 | $204.50| $126.00|
This comparison shows how a seemingly cheaper storage rate (Provider X) might actually cost more due to higher transfer and API costs.
While S3 serves as a pricing benchmark, specialized artifact storage solutions often provide additional value through:
According to a 2022 DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA) report, teams using specialized artifact management solutions experienced 20% fewer deployment failures and 45% faster recovery times.
When evaluating your current provider, watch for these pricing red flags:
While direct cost comparison with S3 provides a useful benchmark, the true value of artifact storage extends beyond raw pricing. Consider these additional factors:
The most cost-effective artifact storage solution might not be the cheapest on paper but rather the one that optimizes your entire software delivery process while maintaining reasonable costs relative to S3.
By conducting regular pricing comparisons and understanding your specific artifact storage needs, you can ensure you're getting fair value—whether you're using S3 directly or a specialized artifact repository solution.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.