.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's cloud-dominated landscape, consumption-based pricing has emerged as a prevalent model for developer tools and infrastructure. Rather than paying a flat monthly fee, teams pay based on what they actually use—whether that's compute time, API calls, or data storage. While this approach promises efficiency and alignment with value, it also introduces a critical challenge: budget predictability. For engineering leaders and finance teams alike, the question looms large—does consumption pricing create more problems than it solves when it comes to managing development costs?
The Rise of Usage-Based Pricing in Developer Tools
Consumption pricing (also called usage-based pricing) has gained significant traction across the developer ecosystem. From cloud providers like AWS and Google Cloud to observability platforms like Datadog and New Relic, companies are increasingly offering pricing models where you pay for what you consume.
The appeal is straightforward:
- Pay only for what you use
- Scale costs with your actual usage
- Avoid overprovisioning resources
- Start small and grow gradually
According to OpenView Partners' 2022 SaaS Benchmarks report, over 45% of SaaS companies now offer some form of usage-based pricing, up from just 34% in 2020. The trend is particularly pronounced in developer-focused tools and infrastructure services.
The Predictability Problem
Despite its advantages, consumption-based pricing introduces significant challenges for budget forecasting and cost management. The primary issue is straightforward: how do you predict what you'll spend when costs fluctuate based on usage that may be difficult to forecast?
Unexpected Cost Spikes
Developer teams often encounter situations where consumption unexpectedly spikes:
- A sudden increase in user traffic
- An inefficient query running repeatedly
- A misconfigured service consuming excess resources
- Development or testing environments left running unnecessarily
A survey by Vertice found that 82% of companies experienced unexpected cloud cost overruns in the past year, with the average overrun exceeding 24% of budgeted amounts.
The Planning Dilemma
For engineering managers and finance teams, usage-based pricing creates a fundamental tension:
- Underestimation risks: Setting budgets too low can lead to mid-quarter crises when funds run out
- Overestimation inefficiency: Padding budgets "just in case" defeats the efficiency purpose of consumption pricing
- Variability challenges: Month-to-month fluctuations complicate quarterly and annual planning
"The most common complaint we hear from customers about consumption pricing is the difficulty in forecasting expenses," explains Sarah Guo, founder of Conviction VC. "Companies want flexibility, but they also need predictability for budgeting purposes."
Strategies for Managing Unpredictability
Despite these challenges, many organizations successfully navigate consumption pricing through proactive cost management approaches:
1. Implement Cost Guardrails
Leading organizations implement automated safeguards:
- Usage alerts and thresholds that trigger notifications
- Service quotas that cap maximum spending
- Automated shutdown of non-production resources during off-hours
2. Embrace FinOps Practices
The emergence of FinOps (Financial Operations) as a discipline directly addresses consumption pricing challenges:
- Cross-functional responsibility for cloud costs
- Regular monitoring and reporting on usage patterns
- Tagging and attribution of costs to specific teams or projects
- Forecasting based on historical usage and growth projections
According to the FinOps Foundation, companies implementing mature FinOps practices report 20-30% lower cloud costs compared to peers without such practices.
3. Negotiate Hybrid Pricing Models
Many vendors now offer hybrid approaches that combine the benefits of consumption pricing with the predictability of subscriptions:
- Committed use discounts for predictable baseline usage
- Reserved capacity with overflow charged at consumption rates
- Annual commitments with flexible usage within bounds
AWS's Savings Plans and Azure's Reserved Instances exemplify this approach, offering significant discounts for committed usage while maintaining flexibility.
Real-World Experiences: Finding Balance
Engineering teams across industries have developed practical approaches to managing consumption pricing unpredictability.
Airbnb's infrastructure team implemented a "cost per request" metric that enabled them to set clear expectations for their AWS spending based on business forecasts. This allowed them to grow their infrastructure with predictable economics despite using consumption-based services.
Spotify developed an internal chargeback mechanism that assigns cloud costs to product teams, creating accountability and incentivizing efficient resource usage while maintaining central oversight for forecasting.
Is Predictability Worth Paying More For?
The fundamental question remains: is the unpredictability of consumption pricing worth accepting for its benefits?
The answer largely depends on:
- Growth stage: Early-stage startups often benefit from the low entry costs and scalability of consumption pricing, while mature enterprises may prioritize predictability
- Usage patterns: Teams with relatively stable, predictable workloads might prefer fixed pricing, while those with variable needs benefit from usage-based models
- Infrastructure maturity: Organizations with sophisticated monitoring and cost management capabilities can better navigate consumption pricing complexity
Finding Your Balance
Rather than viewing consumption pricing as inherently unpredictable, forward-thinking teams are implementing processes and tools to gain the benefits while mitigating the risks:
- Invest in observability: You can't manage what you can't measure. Comprehensive monitoring of both technical and financial metrics is essential
- Build usage forecasting capabilities: Develop models based on historical patterns and business projections
- Create feedback loops: Ensure developers understand the cost implications of their decisions
- Negotiate strategically: Work with vendors to find models that balance flexibility with predictability
Conclusion: Predictability Through Process, Not Pricing
While consumption-based pricing does introduce forecasting challenges, the unpredictability isn't inherent to the model itself but rather to the processes surrounding it. Organizations that invest in proper cost management capabilities can achieve both the efficiency benefits of usage-based pricing and the predictability needed for effective budgeting.
The future likely belongs not to rigid subscription models or pure consumption pricing, but to sophisticated hybrid approaches that combine predictability with flexibility—supported by increasingly mature cost management practices and tools.
For development teams navigating this landscape, the key is not avoiding consumption pricing but developing the capabilities to manage it effectively. With the right processes, usage-based pricing can deliver on its promise of aligning costs with value while maintaining the predictability that businesses require.