.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's competitive SaaS landscape, pricing strategy isn't just a revenue lever—it's a critical competitive advantage. Companies that effectively optimize their pricing can see dramatic improvements in growth metrics and customer acquisition costs. But should you build internal testing infrastructure or leverage external pricing platforms? This decision is becoming increasingly pivotal for SaaS executives looking to maximize their pricing potential.
The Critical Nature of Pricing Optimization for SaaS Companies
Before diving into testing approaches, it's worth understanding the stakes. According to OpenView Partners' 2022 SaaS Benchmarks report, companies that regularly test and optimize pricing see 30% higher growth rates than those that set pricing and rarely revisit it. Pricing optimization isn't just about revenue—it directly impacts customer acquisition efficiency, retention rates, and overall business health.
Internal Price Testing: Building Your Own Infrastructure
Internal testing approaches involve developing proprietary tools and methodologies to run pricing experiments within your product ecosystem.
Advantages of Building Internal Testing Capabilities
1. Complete Control and Customization
Internal testing infrastructure gives you full control over your testing parameters, methodologies, and timelines. You can design experiments specifically tailored to your unique product, customer segments, and business model.
2. Deep Integration with Product and Data
In-house testing can seamlessly integrate with your existing product infrastructure, customer data, and analytics systems. This integration enables more sophisticated testing that leverages your complete customer understanding.
3. Intellectual Property and Competitive Advantage
Proprietary pricing methodologies can become a significant competitive advantage. Companies like Dropbox have developed sophisticated internal pricing platforms that allow them to rapidly iterate on subscription pricing models across global markets.
4. No Third-Party Data Sharing
For companies with sensitive pricing strategies, keeping testing infrastructure internal eliminates concerns about sharing competitive data with external vendors.
Challenges of Internal Testing Infrastructure
1. Resource Investment
Building robust pricing tools requires significant engineering, data science, and product resources. According to pricing consultancy Simon-Kucher & Partners, comprehensive internal testing platforms typically require 6-12 months of development before delivering actionable insights.
2. Expertise Requirements
Effective price testing requires specialized expertise in experimental design, statistical analysis, and pricing strategy. Many organizations lack these capabilities in-house.
3. Opportunity Cost
Resources allocated to building testing infrastructure could be directed toward core product development. This tradeoff must be carefully evaluated, especially for growth-stage companies.
External Pricing Platforms: Leveraging Specialized Solutions
External pricing platforms are purpose-built solutions designed specifically for subscription pricing optimization and testing.
Benefits of External Pricing Tools
1. Speed to Implementation
External platforms can be implemented in weeks rather than months, allowing companies to begin collecting pricing insights faster. According to a 2023 study by Profitwell, companies using external pricing platforms typically launch their first test 75% faster than those building internal solutions.
2. Best Practices Built-In
Leading pricing platforms incorporate methodologies developed across hundreds of SaaS companies. These best practices can help avoid common pitfalls in price testing.
Patrick Campbell, CEO of pricing platform Profitwell (acquired by Paddle), notes: "Most companies think pricing is about finding the perfect price point, but it's actually about building a systematic approach to continuous pricing optimization. External platforms encode these methodologies directly."
3. Lower Initial Resource Requirements
External platforms require significantly less engineering and data science resources to implement, making them accessible to companies without large technical teams.
4. Benchmarking and Market Context
Many external platforms provide comparative benchmarking data, allowing companies to understand how their pricing performs relative to industry standards.
Drawbacks of External Pricing Platforms
1. Integration Limitations
External tools may have limitations in how deeply they can integrate with your existing systems and data models, potentially restricting testing complexity.
2. Less Customization
While increasingly flexible, external platforms may not accommodate highly specialized testing requirements unique to your business model.
3. Ongoing Costs
Subscription fees for robust external pricing platforms typically range from $1,000-$5,000 monthly, representing a significant ongoing investment.
Making the Strategic Decision
The choice between internal and external price testing approaches should be guided by several key factors:
1. Current Pricing Maturity
Companies just beginning their pricing optimization journey often benefit from the structure and guidance of external platforms. More advanced organizations may require the customization of internal tools.
2. Available Resources
Be realistic about your engineering and data science capabilities. Building internal testing infrastructure requires dedicated resources that could otherwise focus on core product development.
3. Timeline to Value
How quickly do you need pricing insights? External platforms typically deliver faster initial results, while internal systems provide long-term strategic advantages.
4. Strategic Importance of Pricing
For companies where pricing is a core competitive differentiator, the investment in proprietary testing infrastructure may deliver significant returns. According to McKinsey, companies that treat pricing as a strategic capability achieve 3-8% higher margins than competitors.
Hybrid Approaches: The Emerging Best Practice
Increasingly, forward-thinking SaaS companies are adopting hybrid approaches that combine external platforms for rapid initial testing with selective internal infrastructure for specialized experiments.
Stripe, for example, leverages external tools for certain aspects of pricing testing while maintaining sophisticated internal infrastructure for core pricing elements. This hybrid model allows them to benefit from external expertise while developing proprietary capabilities in strategically important areas.
Conclusion: Aligning Testing Infrastructure with Strategic Goals
The decision between internal testing capabilities and external pricing platforms isn't merely technical—it's strategic. The right approach aligns with your company's resources, timeline, and the competitive importance of pricing in your market.
For most growth-stage SaaS businesses, external pricing platforms offer the most efficient path to improved pricing, with selective internal capabilities developed over time in areas of strategic differentiation. For enterprise companies with unique pricing models or those competing primarily on pricing innovation, more substantial investments in internal testing infrastructure may be justified.
Regardless of approach, the most important factor is commitment to continuous pricing optimization. Companies that systematically test and refine their pricing strategies consistently outperform those that treat pricing as a one-time decision.
The question isn't whether to optimize your pricing—it's how to build the testing infrastructure that best supports your business objectives and customer relationships.