.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Understanding what customers will actually pay for your SaaS product shouldn't be guesswork. Correlation analysis for willingness to pay offers a data-driven approach to uncover which features genuinely drive pricing power—and which ones customers consider table stakes.
Quick Answer: Correlation analysis for willingness to pay involves collecting customer usage data, feature engagement metrics, and stated WTP, then using statistical methods (Pearson, Spearman correlation) to identify which features drive pricing power, enabling you to align packaging and pricing with true customer value perception.
This guide walks you through the complete methodology for conducting WTP correlation research, from data collection to actionable pricing decisions.
What Is Correlation Analysis in the Context of Willingness to Pay?
Correlation analysis measures the statistical relationship between two variables—in this case, between feature usage patterns and how much customers are willing to pay. When applied to pricing research, it reveals which product capabilities have the strongest association with higher WTP.
The core principle is straightforward: if customers who heavily use Feature X consistently express or demonstrate higher willingness to pay, there's likely a meaningful connection between that feature and perceived value. By quantifying these relationships across your entire feature set, you can identify your true value drivers versus features that don't move the pricing needle.
This approach bridges the gap between what customers say they value and what their behavior actually indicates—giving you empirical evidence to support pricing decisions.
Why Traditional Pricing Research Misses Feature-Value Connections
Surveys and focus groups remain valuable, but they have inherent limitations. Customers often struggle to articulate feature value accurately. They may overstate the importance of features they rarely use or undervalue capabilities they've internalized into their workflow.
Behavioral data correlation addresses these gaps by examining what customers actually do, not just what they say. When you combine stated preferences with usage patterns, you get a more complete picture of value perception.
Data-driven pricing approaches also scale more effectively. Instead of relying on qualitative insights from a handful of interviews, correlation analysis can process engagement data from your entire customer base—revealing patterns that would be impossible to detect through traditional methods alone.
Data Sources You Need for WTP Correlation Analysis
Effective WTP correlation research requires three categories of data:
Product usage analytics and feature engagement data: Track which features customers use, how frequently, and with what depth. This includes login frequency, time spent in specific modules, feature activation rates, and workflow completion metrics.
Transaction and customer segment data: Capture current pricing tier, contract value, expansion revenue, and retention rates. Segment by company size, industry, and acquisition channel to identify patterns within cohorts.
Survey-based WTP indicators: Use structured methodologies like Van Westendorp price sensitivity or Gabor-Granger surveys to capture stated willingness to pay at the individual account level.
Preparing Your Data for Analysis
Before running correlations, your data needs preparation:
Clean your dataset by removing outliers, handling missing values, and ensuring consistent time periods across metrics. A customer's feature usage from Q1 shouldn't be correlated with WTP data from Q4.
Create composite feature engagement scores that normalize usage across different feature types. Raw "number of clicks" isn't comparable across features—convert to percentile rankings or standardized scores within each feature category.
Step-by-Step: Running Correlation Analysis for Feature Value Discovery
Choose your correlation method based on data characteristics:
Pearson correlation works best when both variables (feature usage and WTP) follow a roughly normal distribution and have a linear relationship. It measures the strength and direction of linear associations.
Spearman correlation is preferable for ordinal data or when relationships might be non-linear. If your WTP data comes from discrete pricing tier selections rather than continuous dollar amounts, Spearman is often more appropriate.
Calculate correlation coefficients between each feature engagement score and your WTP variable. The resulting r-values range from -1 to +1, with values closer to the extremes indicating stronger relationships.
Don't skip statistical significance testing. With large sample sizes, even weak correlations can appear significant. Aim for a minimum sample of 100+ customers per segment, and look for p-values below 0.05 before drawing conclusions.
Tools and Software Options
For basic analysis, Excel or Google Sheets handle correlation matrices adequately. Use CORREL() for Pearson and RANK-based formulas for Spearman.
Python (with pandas and scipy) or R enables more sophisticated analysis, including partial correlations that control for confounding variables and automated significance testing.
Specialized pricing analytics platforms can streamline the entire workflow, connecting directly to your product analytics and CRM data.
Visual concept: A correlation matrix heatmap displaying feature engagement scores on one axis and WTP segments on the other, with color intensity indicating correlation strength—making it immediately clear which features cluster with higher willingness to pay.
Interpreting Correlation Results to Inform Pricing Decisions
Understanding correlation strength requires context:
- r = 0.7 to 1.0: Strong correlation—these features are prime candidates for premium tier differentiation
- r = 0.4 to 0.7: Moderate correlation—features that add value but may not justify standalone pricing
- r = below 0.4: Weak correlation—likely table stakes or features that don't influence WTP
Identify your high-value features (strong positive correlations) versus table stakes (widely used but weak WTP correlation). Table stakes belong in your base tier; high-value features justify premium positioning.
Crucially, correlation does not imply causation. A feature might correlate with higher WTP because power users adopt it—not because the feature itself creates value. Use correlation as a starting hypothesis, then validate through additional research.
Translating Insights Into Pricing and Packaging Strategy
With correlation data in hand, apply findings to pricing architecture:
Tiering decisions: Features with strong WTP correlation and lower adoption rates are natural candidates for higher tiers. Features with strong correlation and high adoption may justify raising base tier prices.
Add-on determinations: Features that correlate strongly with WTP but serve specific use cases make effective standalone add-ons, allowing value-based capture without forcing full tier upgrades.
Value metric selection: If a particular usage dimension (API calls, seats, storage) shows the strongest WTP correlation, consider it for your primary pricing metric.
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Confounding variables: Heavy feature users might have higher WTP simply because they're larger companies with bigger budgets. Control for company size and segment in your analysis.
Correlation without causation errors: Resist the urge to assume features cause higher WTP. The relationship might be reversed or driven by a third variable entirely.
Sample bias: If your WTP survey only reaches satisfied customers, your correlation data will skew positive. Ensure representative sampling across customer health segments.
Real-World Application: Mini Case Example
A B2B project management SaaS analyzed feature engagement across 850 accounts alongside Van Westendorp survey results. Their correlation analysis revealed:
- Advanced reporting features showed r = 0.72 correlation with WTP—much higher than assumed
- Their heavily marketed automation module showed only r = 0.31 correlation
- Integration usage correlated at r = 0.68 with willingness to pay premium prices
Based on these findings, they repositioned advanced reporting as the flagship feature of their Business tier (previously buried in Enterprise), created an integrations add-on, and reduced marketing emphasis on automation—which customers valued but wouldn't pay extra for.
Result: 18% increase in Business tier conversions within two quarters.
Correlation analysis complements rather than replaces qualitative customer research. The numbers tell you what patterns exist; customer conversations tell you why. Used together, they create a foundation for pricing decisions grounded in both data and customer insight.
Download our WTP Correlation Analysis Template and start identifying your highest-value features with data-driven confidence.