
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for building agentic applications—systems that can understand, reason, and act autonomously on behalf of users. However, with a proliferating array of models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and open-source alternatives, selecting the right LLM for your specific agentic application can be challenging.
This guide will walk you through the essential considerations for LLM selection when building agentic applications, helping you navigate technical requirements, performance benchmarks, and practical implementation concerns.
Agentic applications represent the next frontier in AI implementation—systems that can perform complex tasks with minimal human supervision. These applications might handle everything from autonomous research and data analysis to customer service and complex decision-making processes.
When selecting a large language model for such applications, you're not just choosing a text generator; you're selecting the cognitive engine that will power your agent's ability to understand context, make decisions, and take actions.
For a language model to effectively power agentic applications, it should excel in:
Let's examine how various language models compare on key dimensions relevant to agentic applications:
GPT-4 and its variants represent some of the most capable models for agentic applications according to most benchmarks.
Strengths:
Considerations:
According to a 2023 Stanford HELM benchmark study, GPT-4 demonstrated a 30% improvement over previous models in multi-step reasoning tasks critical for agentic applications.
Claude-2 and more recent iterations offer compelling alternatives for agentic applications with particular strengths in safety.
Strengths:
Considerations:
Gemini Pro and Ultra represent Google's entry into the high-performance LLM space.
Strengths:
Considerations:
Models like Llama 2, Mistral, and other open-source LLMs offer different tradeoffs:
Strengths:
Considerations:
A recent evaluation by Hugging Face found that while open-source models still lag behind proprietary options for complex agentic tasks, the gap is narrowing—with models like Mixtral 8x7B achieving 85% of GPT-4's performance on reasoning benchmarks while offering significantly more deployment flexibility.
When evaluating large language models for your agentic application, consider these technical factors:
The context window determines how much information your agent can process at once—a critical factor for complex tasks:
For agentic applications that need to reason over large documents or maintain extensive conversation history, larger context windows provide significant advantages.
Response time can be critical depending on your application:
Your infrastructure requirements will influence LLM selection:
The economic aspects of LLM selection can significantly impact the viability of agentic applications:
LLM pricing typically follows token-based models:
| Model Type | Input Cost Range (per 1M tokens) | Output Cost Range (per 1M tokens) |
|------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Top-tier proprietary (GPT-4, Claude-2) | $10-$20 | $30-$60 |
| Mid-tier proprietary (GPT-3.5, Claude Instant) | $1-$3 | $2-$6 |
| Open source (self-hosted) | Hardware costs only | Hardware costs only |
To optimize costs while maintaining performance:
To systematically evaluate large language models for your agentic application, consider this framework:
Begin by documenting:
Test shortlisted models on:
Consider:
Factor in:
A financial services company needed an agentic application to analyze earnings reports and identify market trends. Their selection process illustrated key tradeoffs:
Initial testing showed GPT-4 provided superior analysis quality but at a cost that would exceed $50,000 monthly at their expected usage volume. An open-source Llama 2 model showed promise but struggled with financial terminology and multi-step reasoning.
Their solution: A hybrid approach using:
This approach reduced projected costs by 78% while maintaining 92% of the analysis quality of the pure GPT-4 solution.
The landscape of large language models continues to evolve rapidly. When planning your agentic application strategy, consider these trends:
Selecting the optimal large language model for your agentic application requires balancing capability requirements, technical constraints, and economic considerations. The most successful implementations often leverage multiple models strategically, using the right tool for each specific subtask while maintaining a coherent agent experience.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.