.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This article expands on a discussion originally shared by TechusInc on Reddit — enhanced with additional analysis and frameworks.
Selecting the right pricing model is one of the most critical strategic decisions for SaaS businesses. The model you choose not only impacts your revenue but also shapes customer acquisition, retention, and your overall growth trajectory. For early-stage founders, understanding the strengths and limitations of each pricing approach can mean the difference between struggling for traction and building sustainable growth.
While many founders default to freemium or complex multi-tiered pricing because "that's what everyone else does," the optimal pricing structure actually depends on your specific business stage, customer segments, and growth objectives. Let's examine the main SaaS pricing models, when to use them, and which approaches work best at different company stages.
The 7 Core SaaS Pricing Models Explained
Each pricing model has distinct advantages and limitations that make it suitable for different types of products and customer segments:
Free (Limited)
A completely free product with usage or feature constraints. This model is not directly monetized but serves as an acquisition channel.
Best for: Products with viral potential, platforms that benefit from network effects, or services where user data has significant value.
Example: Slack's free plan allows small teams to use core messaging features with limited message history.
Freemium
Offers a basic version for free with paid upgrades for premium features. The free tier acts as a lead generation tool, while paid tiers deliver enhanced value.
Best for: Products with low marginal costs, clear feature differentiation, and where user adoption drives value.
Example: Dropbox gives users 2GB of storage free, charging for additional space and collaboration features.
Flat-Rate
A single price point for all features, typically billed monthly or annually.
Best for: Simple products with a clear value proposition, early-stage companies seeking predictable revenue, or products targeting a homogeneous market segment.
Example: Basecamp charges a flat monthly fee for unlimited users and projects.
Tiered Pricing
Multiple packages at different price points, each with a distinct set of features or usage limits.
Best for: Products serving diverse customer segments with varying needs, companies with clear feature differentiation between basic and advanced use cases.
Example: HubSpot offers Starter, Professional, and Enterprise tiers with progressively more sophisticated marketing features.
Per-User Pricing
Charging based on the number of users accessing the software.
Best for: Collaboration tools, internal productivity software, or products where value scales with user count.
Example: Salesforce charges per user per month across its different product lines.
Usage-Based
Pricing tied directly to consumption metrics (API calls, storage, processing power, etc.).
Best for: Infrastructure products, data-processing tools, or services where usage correlates with customer value.
Example: AWS charges based on computing resources used, storage consumed, and data transferred.
Custom Enterprise Pricing
Tailored pricing packages for larger customers with specific requirements.
Best for: Complex products with high-touch sales processes, solutions targeting enterprise customers, or offerings requiring significant customization.
Example: Workday typically uses custom pricing for its enterprise HR and finance platforms.
The Pricing Paradox for Early-Stage Founders
While freemium and tiered pricing are often recommended for beginners, analysis of over 200 SaaS startups reveals a counterintuitive truth: simpler pricing models frequently outperform complex ones in the early stages.
The data shows three common pricing mistakes that early-stage founders make:
1. The Freemium Trap: Giving Away Too Much Value
Many founders create freemium tiers that are too generous. Analysis of conversion rates shows that overly generous free tiers typically convert at just 1-3%, compared to 5-7% for well-designed freemium structures.
When free plans include nearly all core functionality, users have little incentive to upgrade. Additionally, supporting a large base of non-paying users creates significant costs with minimal revenue return.
2. The Segmentation Assumption: Creating Tiers Without Evidence
Developing multi-tiered pricing requires deep understanding of customer segments and their willingness to pay. Early-stage companies rarely have sufficient data to create effective tiers, leading to pricing structures that miss market expectations.
In one study of B2B SaaS startups, 62% of companies that started with 3+ pricing tiers reduced their offerings within the first 18 months after realizing they couldn't effectively serve or differentiate between segments.
3. The Revenue Delay: Prioritizing Adoption Over Monetization
While user adoption is important, delaying monetization through free-first approaches often extends runway requirements unnecessarily. Companies that begin with paid-only models typically reach $1M ARR 4-7 months faster than those starting with freemium approaches.
Which Model Works Best at Different Business Stages?
The optimal pricing strategy evolves with your business:
Pre-Product-Market Fit Stage
Recommended approach: Flat-rate or simple tiered pricing
At this stage, simplicity is key. A straightforward pricing model helps you:
- Start generating revenue immediately
- Test willingness to pay
- Identify what features customers actually value
- Focus on serving paying customers who provide the most valuable feedback
Avoid: Complex tiered systems or freemium models that delay validation of your value proposition.
Early Growth Stage ($1-5M ARR)
Recommended approach: Refined tiered pricing or value-based models
As you gather data on customer segments and usage patterns, you can:
- Introduce tiers based on observed usage patterns
- Add a free trial (14-30 days) rather than a permanent free tier
- Begin experimenting with expansion metrics (seat-based or usage-based components)
Avoid: Custom pricing for all customers, which doesn't scale efficiently at this stage.
Scaling Stage ($5-25M ARR)
Recommended approach: Multi-dimensional pricing
As your product matures and market sophistication grows, consider:
- Combining approaches (e.g., tiered + per-user or tiered + usage)
- Adding enterprise tiers with custom components
- Implementing value metrics that align pricing with customer outcomes
- Potentially introducing a limited free tier if acquisition costs are high
Avoid: Radical pricing changes that might disrupt existing customer relationships.
Enterprise Stage ($25M+ ARR)
Recommended approach: Portfolio pricing strategy
At scale, sophisticated companies typically employ:
- Multiple pricing models across different product lines
- Custom enterprise agreements for large accounts
- Value-based pricing tied to business outcomes
- Professional services components for implementation and customization
How to Choose Your Initial Pricing Model: A Decision Framework
When selecting your initial pricing approach, consider these key factors:
1. Customer Acquisition Cost
High CAC → Consider freemium or free trials
Low CAC → Start with paid-only models
If acquiring customers is expensive or difficult, a free entry point helps reduce friction. However, if you can acquire customers cost-effectively through other channels, starting with paid tiers accelerates revenue growth.
2. Marginal Cost Structure
High marginal costs → Usage-based or tiered
Low marginal costs → Flat-rate or per-user
Products with significant costs per additional user (like compute-intensive services) should tie pricing to usage. Products with negligible incremental costs can afford flat-rate structures.
3. Value Metric Clarity
Clear value metric → Usage-based or per-user
Unclear value delivery → Tiered or flat-rate
If customers clearly understand how they extract value (e.g., number of emails sent, leads generated), align pricing with that metric. If value perception is less concrete, feature-based tiers may work better.
4. Market Education
Educated market → Value-based or usage-based
Uneducated market → Flat-rate or simple tiered
In markets where customers understand the problem and competitive landscape, sophisticated pricing tied to value works well. In newer markets, simplicity helps reduce friction in the buying process.
5. Competitive Landscape
Commoditized space → Freemium or competitive tiered
Blue ocean → Value-based or flat-rate
Highly competitive markets may require a free tier or competitive pricing to gain traction. Unique offerings can focus on value-based pricing that reflects their differentiation.
Implementation: Starting Simple and Evolving
The most successful SaaS companies typically follow this pricing evolution pattern:
- Start with a simple model (flat-rate or 2-3 tiers maximum)
- Add a value metric that scales with customer success
- Introduce expansion dimensions (users, usage, features)
- **