
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's digital landscape, robust identity and access management (IAM) solutions have become essential for businesses of all sizes. Two leading contenders in this space—Okta and Auth0 (now an Okta company)—offer powerful identity management platforms, but their pricing structures differ significantly. This detailed comparison will help you understand the cost implications of each solution to make an informed decision for your organization.
Before diving into specific platforms, it's important to recognize what drives costs in identity management solutions:
With identity-related breaches costing organizations an average of $4.5 million according to IBM's Cost of a Data Breach Report, investing in the right authentication solution is both a security and financial decision.
Okta offers a tiered pricing model based on users and features:
For organizations seeking a comprehensive solution, Okta offers bundles:
Okta's Customer Identity Cloud (formerly Auth0) typically follows a monthly active user (MAU) model:
It's worth noting that Okta requires annual commitments for most business plans, which impacts overall identity management costs.
While Auth0 is now an Okta company, its pricing structure remains distinct:
According to industry analyses, Auth0 tends to be more cost-effective for customer-facing applications with irregular usage patterns, while Okta's per-user pricing may be more predictable for workforce applications.
When comparing authentication SaaS costs specifically for Single Sign-On functionality:
| Feature | Okta | Auth0 |
|---------|------|-------|
| Base SSO | $2-4 per user monthly | Included in MAU pricing |
| MFA Options | Often priced separately | More features included in base pricing |
| B2B Connections | Included in higher tiers | Additional costs may apply |
| API Usage Limits | Strict limits on base plans | More generous on comparable tiers |
A mid-sized company with 1,000 employees might spend approximately $24,000-48,000 annually on Okta's workforce solution, while a comparable Auth0 implementation would vary based on actual authentication patterns.
Beyond the advertised rates, consider these potential cost factors:
Both platforms require initial setup:
GDPR, HIPAA, or financial regulations may require advanced features:
When evaluating identity management pricing between Okta and Auth0, consider:
While Okta generally offers more predictable per-user pricing that works well for employee-focused implementations, Auth0 provides a usage-based model that can be more cost-effective for customer-facing applications with variable authentication patterns.
For organizations with hybrid needs (both workforce and customer identity), evaluating the total cost of ownership for both platforms is essential. Many enterprises find that the technical capabilities, integration options, and security features ultimately outweigh small differences in base pricing.
As you evaluate identity management solutions, request detailed quotes from both providers based on your specific requirements, and consider engaging with implementation partners who can provide real-world cost estimates based on your unique environment.
Remember that the right identity platform is an investment in security, user experience, and operational efficiency—making it worth the time to thoroughly evaluate all cost considerations beyond the basic pricing tiers.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.