.png)
Estd 4.22.2023
In today's complex buyer journey, attributing revenue to specific marketing efforts has become increasingly challenging. Traditional attribution models that focus solely on first or last touch fail to capture the nuanced reality of how B2B customers make purchasing decisions. This is where influence revenue attribution comes in—a methodology that recognizes and quantifies how multiple touchpoints collectively contribute to revenue generation.
Why Traditional Attribution Falls Short
The average B2B purchase involves 6-10 decision-makers and 27 touchpoints across multiple channels, according to Gartner research. Yet many SaaS companies still rely on simplistic attribution models that credit either the first interaction that generated a lead or the final touchpoint before conversion.
These binary approaches miss the critical middle-funnel activities that influence purchasing decisions. For executives seeking accurate ROI calculations and optimal resource allocation, this presents a significant blind spot.
Understanding Influence Revenue Attribution
Influence attribution recognizes that revenue results from a constellation of marketing touchpoints rather than a single interaction. This approach measures how each touchpoint contributes to moving opportunities through the sales pipeline, regardless of whether it was the first, last, or somewhere in between.
Key Differences from Traditional Attribution
| Traditional Attribution | Influence Attribution |
|------------------------|----------------------|
| Credits a single touchpoint | Distributes credit across multiple touchpoints |
| Often binary (first/last touch) | Weighted based on impact |
| Channel-centric | Customer journey-centric |
| Prone to internal competition | Encourages cross-channel collaboration |
How to Calculate Influence Revenue Attribution
Step 1: Define Your Attribution Window
First, determine the timeframe within which marketing touchpoints will be considered influential. This typically includes:
- Pre-opportunity marketing activities
- Touchpoints during the sales cycle
- Post-sale engagements (for expansion revenue)
According to Forrester, B2B SaaS companies should consider touchpoints from at least 6-12 months before conversion, as enterprise buying cycles often span multiple quarters.
Step 2: Identify and Track All Touchpoints
Catalog all possible marketing interactions across:
- Digital channels (website visits, content downloads, webinars)
- Physical events (trade shows, customer meetups)
- Sales interactions that involve marketing materials
- Customer success touchpoints
Each interaction should be tagged with:
- Channel source
- Campaign association
- Content type
- Engagement depth metrics
Step 3: Apply Weighting Criteria
Not all touchpoints are created equal. Develop a weighting system based on:
Engagement Quality
- Time spent with content (e.g., partial vs. complete webinar attendance)
- Depth of interaction (passive view vs. active participation)
- Repeat engagements with similar content
Buying Stage Relevance
- Awareness stage: 1.0x multiplier
- Consideration stage: 1.5x multiplier
- Decision stage: 2.0x multiplier
Decision Maker Involvement
- C-suite engagement: 2.5x multiplier
- Director-level: 2.0x multiplier
- Manager-level: 1.5x multiplier
- Individual contributor: 1.0x multiplier
Step 4: Create Your Influence Attribution Formula
A basic influence attribution calculation follows this structure:
Touchpoint Influence Value = (Engagement Score × Stage Multiplier × Decision Maker Multiplier)Influence Revenue Attribution = (Touchpoint Influence Value ÷ Total Influence Value of All Touchpoints) × Closed RevenueFor example, if a VP of Operations spent 45 minutes in a product demo webinar during the decision stage, and this represented 15% of the total influence value across all touchpoints for a $100,000 deal, that webinar would receive $15,000 in influence-attributed revenue.
Step 5: Implement Multi-Touch Analysis
For a more sophisticated approach, implement one of these multi-touch attribution models:
Time-Decay Attribution
Touchpoints closer to conversion receive progressively more credit. This works well for shorter sales cycles where recency matters.
Position-Based Attribution
A hybrid approach that typically assigns 40% credit to first touch, 40% to last touch, and divides the remaining 20% among middle touchpoints.
Algorithmic Attribution
Leverages machine learning to dynamically determine influence weights based on historical patterns. According to McKinsey, companies using algorithmic attribution report 15-30% greater marketing efficiency.
Implementation Challenges and Solutions
Data Integration Hurdles
Challenge: Marketing touchpoint data often lives in multiple systems (MAP, CRM, webinar platforms, event management software).
Solution: Implement a customer data platform (CDP) or marketing attribution platform that centralizes interactions. Companies like Bizible, Attribution, and Full Circle Insights specialize in connecting these data points for SaaS businesses.
Organizational Alignment
Challenge: Different departments may resist influence attribution as it redistributes "credit" for revenue.
Solution: Frame influence attribution as expanding the pie rather than dividing it. Showing how multiple teams contribute to success often increases cross-functional collaboration. Convince stakeholders with pilot programs showing more accurate ROI calculations.
Real-World Application: A SaaS Case Study
Cloud security platform Netskope implemented influence revenue attribution and discovered that their technical webinars—previously undervalued in their last-touch model—actually influenced 34% of enterprise deals exceeding $250,000.
This revelation led them to:
- Increase investment in technical content by 28%
- Develop specialized webinars for different buyer personas
- Integrate technical experts earlier in the sales process
The result was a 22% increase in average deal size and a 15% reduction in sales cycle length within two quarters.
Moving Beyond Basic Attribution
Advanced practitioners are now incorporating additional dimensions:
Negative Attribution
Measuring touchpoints that correlate with lost deals or extended sales cycles to identify problematic content or approaches.
Content Journey Mapping
Analyzing which content sequences lead to highest conversion rates, enabling the creation of optimized nurture paths.
Account-Based Attribution
For B2B SaaS companies using ABM strategies, measuring influence across the entire buying committee rather than individual leads.
Getting Started with Influence Revenue Attribution
Audit your current attribution capabilities - Assess what touchpoint data you're currently capturing and where gaps exist.
Start with a hybrid model - Begin with a position-based attribution model that acknowledges both lead generation and conversion touchpoints while still recognizing middle-funnel influence.
Implement progressive refinement - Don't aim for perfection immediately. Start with major touchpoints and add sophistication as your process matures.
Invest in attribution technology - While spreadsheets can work for basic calculations, purpose-built attribution platforms provide much greater accuracy and time savings.
Create feedback loops - Ensure attribution insights flow back to content creation and campaign planning teams to continuously optimize your marketing mix.
Conclusion
Calculating influence revenue attribution requires a shift in thinking from simplistic models to a more nuanced understanding of how marketing activities collectively impact buying decisions. By implementing a systematic approach to measuring touchpoint influence, SaaS executives gain clearer visibility into what's truly driving revenue and can make more informed investment decisions.
As buying committees grow larger and customer journeys become more complex, influence attribution will only become more essential for SaaS companies looking to maximize marketing ROI and create truly customer-centric experiences that match the realities of today's buying processes.