.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of agentic AI technology, inventory optimization automation has emerged as a critical application for businesses looking to maintain competitive advantages. But as organizations implement these sophisticated AI agents to streamline operations, a fundamental question arises: what's the most effective pricing model for these systems?
Whether you're a SaaS provider offering inventory optimization solutions or a business evaluating different options, understanding the implications of various pricing structures can significantly impact both the provider's sustainability and the customer's return on investment.
Let's explore the three primary pricing models for inventory optimization agents—per seat, per action, and per outcome—and determine which approach might best align with your business objectives.
Understanding Pricing Models for AI Agents
Per-Seat Pricing: The Traditional Approach
Per-seat pricing has long been the standard for enterprise software. Under this model, companies pay for each user who accesses the inventory optimization agent.
Advantages:
- Predictable revenue for vendors
- Simple to understand and budget for customers
- Clear capacity planning based on user counts
Disadvantages:
- Doesn't necessarily align with the value delivered
- May create perverse incentives to limit access within an organization
- Can become expensive as organizations scale usage
According to a 2023 report by Gartner, while 68% of enterprise software still uses some form of per-seat pricing, this model is declining in popularity for AI-based solutions, dropping by 12% over the past two years.
Per-Action Pricing: Usage-Based Models
Usage-based pricing ties costs directly to the volume of operations performed by the inventory optimization agent—such as inventory analyses run, recommendation reports generated, or automated reordering actions taken.
Advantages:
- Creates a direct correlation between usage and cost
- Allows for flexible scaling based on business needs
- Provides a lower entry point for smaller organizations or departments
Disadvantages:
- Less predictable costs for customers
- Potentially complex billing structures
- May require guardrails to prevent unexpected costs
"Usage-based pricing for AI agents grew by 37% in 2023," notes McKinsey's State of AI report, "with organizations preferring the flexibility to scale costs with actual utilization rather than fixed licensing."
Outcome-Based Pricing: Aligning with Business Value
The most innovative approach ties pricing directly to measurable business outcomes produced by the inventory optimization automation—reduced stockouts, lowered carrying costs, or improved inventory turnover.
Advantages:
- Perfect alignment between cost and value delivered
- Creates shared incentives between vendor and customer
- Demonstrates vendor confidence in solution effectiveness
Disadvantages:
- Requires sophisticated tracking and measurement
- More complex contracts with defined success metrics
- Challenges in isolating the AI agent's specific impact
According to Forrester Research, outcome-based pricing models for AI solutions have seen 86% higher customer satisfaction rates compared to traditional models, though they represent only about 14% of current implementations.
Key Factors in Choosing a Pricing Strategy
Business Maturity and AI Readiness
Organizations with mature data practices and clear inventory KPIs may be better positioned for outcome-based models, while those still developing their AI capabilities might prefer the simplicity of per-seat or the flexibility of per-action models.
Value Measurement Capabilities
Implementing outcome-based pricing requires robust orchestration and LLMOps frameworks that can accurately attribute results to the AI agent's actions. Without these systems, simpler pricing models may be more practical.
A 2023 study by Deloitte found that only 31% of organizations had sufficient measurement capabilities to effectively implement outcome-based pricing for their AI systems.
Risk Tolerance and Budget Predictability
Per-seat pricing offers the most predictable costs, while outcome-based models shift more risk to the vendor but may introduce more variability in expenses.
Scale of Implementation
Credit-based pricing, a specialized form of usage-based pricing, can offer flexibility for organizations implementing inventory optimization at varying scales across different business units.
Real-World Pricing Examples
Several leading providers have established interesting approaches:
IBM's Watson Supply Chain uses a hybrid model with base per-seat pricing plus outcome-based bonuses tied to inventory reduction targets.
Blue Yonder offers a credit-based pricing system where different inventory optimization actions consume varying amounts of credits, allowing for customized usage patterns.
Coupa's AI Inventory Management employs outcome-based pricing that ties fees directly to measured reductions in carrying costs, with minimum performance guarantees.
Finding Your Optimal Pricing Structure
The ideal pricing model ultimately depends on specific business contexts, but several trends are emerging:
Hybrid Models: Many successful implementations combine approaches, such as a base per-seat fee with outcome-based incentives or a credit system with volume discounts.
Risk-Sharing Contracts: More vendors are offering trial periods with outcome guarantees before transitioning to standard pricing models.
Value-Defined Metrics: The most successful pricing structures define clear, measurable value metrics that both parties agree represent genuine business impact.
Conclusion: Aligning Pricing with Value Creation
When implementing inventory optimization automation, the pricing model should reflect how value is actually created. For most organizations, this suggests:
Pure per-seat pricing makes sense only when user access itself is the primary value driver.
Per-action or credit-based models work well during implementation phases when outcomes aren't yet fully measurable.
Outcome-based pricing represents the ideal "end state" when proper measurement systems are in place, creating perfect alignment between vendor success and customer value.
Ultimately, as agentic AI continues revolutionizing inventory management, pricing models will continue evolving toward structures that reward genuine business transformation rather than mere software usage. The most successful vendors will be those who can confidently tie their compensation directly to the measurable improvements their AI agents deliver.