.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In today's complex software landscape, observability has become a critical component for organizations of all sizes. As businesses increasingly rely on distributed systems, microservices, and cloud infrastructure, the need for robust monitoring and observability solutions has grown exponentially. This creates an interesting challenge for observability platform vendors: how to price their open source editions to balance community growth with sustainable business models?
The Open Source Observability Landscape
The observability market is crowded with solutions ranging from fully proprietary to completely open source. Notable players like Prometheus, Grafana, Jaeger, and OpenTelemetry have established themselves as foundational open source tools in the observability ecosystem. Meanwhile, commercial vendors like Datadog, New Relic, Dynatrace, and Splunk offer sophisticated platforms with both open source components and proprietary features.
According to a 2023 CNCF survey, over 70% of enterprises now use some form of open source monitoring or observability tool in their technology stack. This widespread adoption creates both opportunities and challenges for vendors offering open source editions.
The Strategic Value of Open Source Editions
Before diving into pricing strategies, it's important to understand why observability platforms offer open source editions in the first place:
Community Building: Open source creates a community of users who contribute feedback, bug reports, and sometimes code improvements.
Market Education: Free tools help educate the market about observability practices and create demand for more advanced solutions.
Developer Adoption: Engineers often prefer starting with open source tools they can test without procurement overhead.
Competitive Positioning: In a crowded market, having an open source offering can differentiate a vendor and provide entry into organizations using competitors' products.
Pricing Models for Open Source Observability
When determining how to price open source editions, observability vendors typically consider several approaches:
1. The "Freemium" Model
The most common approach involves offering a fully-functional but limited open source edition with clear upsell paths to commercial offerings. For example, Grafana Labs provides open source Grafana dashboarding while reserving enterprise features and cloud services for paying customers.
This model works well when:
- The open source edition provides genuine value independently
- There's a natural scaling point where users need to upgrade
- The company has a clear monetization strategy beyond the free tier
2. Open Core Approach
In this model, the core functionality is open source, but extensions, advanced features, and enterprise capabilities are proprietary and paid. Elasticsearch followed this path, keeping their core search engine open while commercializing monitoring, security, and machine learning features.
The challenge with open core is defining the boundary between free and paid features. Too restrictive, and community adoption suffers; too generous, and monetization becomes difficult.
3. Services and Support Monetization
Some observability vendors keep their software fully open source but monetize through professional services, support contracts, and training. This approach, popularized by companies like Red Hat, requires significant investment in customer success and support infrastructure.
According to Gartner, enterprise clients typically allocate 15-20% of their software budgets to support and services, making this a viable monetization channel for APM and monitoring solutions with complex deployments.
4. Cloud-Hosted/SaaS Model
Increasingly popular is the model where the software remains open source, but the vendor monetizes a fully-managed cloud service. Prometheus exemplifies this approach—the monitoring system itself is open source, but vendors offer hosted Prometheus with added capabilities like long-term storage and advanced querying.
This model aligns well with modern preferences for SaaS and can provide recurring revenue while still supporting the open source community.
Key Considerations for Pricing Open Source Editions
When developing a pricing strategy for open source observability tools, vendors should consider:
Usage Metrics That Matter
Different observability platforms track different usage metrics:
- Data volume: Amount of telemetry data ingested (GB/day)
- Retention period: How long data is stored
- Monitored entities: Number of hosts, containers, or services
- Users: Number of dashboard viewers or alert recipients
Each metric creates different incentives. Charging by data volume might discourage comprehensive instrumentation, while charging by users could limit collaboration.
Community vs. Commercial Features
Vendors must carefully determine which capabilities belong in the open source edition and which should be commercial-only. Common commercial features include:
- Advanced security and compliance features
- Enterprise integrations (SSO, RBAC, etc.)
- SLO and SLA monitoring
- Advanced analytics and AI/ML capabilities
- Extended data retention
- Premium support
The most successful platforms ensure their open source edition provides complete functionality for core use cases while reserving enterprise-specific features for paying customers.
Best Practices for Observability Pricing
Based on market analysis and customer feedback, here are key recommendations for observability platform vendors:
1. Embrace True Open Source
If you label something as open source, ensure it adheres to open source principles and licensing. Organizations are increasingly wary of "fauxpen source" offerings that claim to be open but restrict usage or modification rights.
2. Provide Clear Upgrade Paths
Users should understand exactly what they get with the open source edition and what paid tiers provide. Transparency builds trust and helps users plan their observability journey.
3. Scale Pricing With Value
According to research by OpenView Partners, the most successful open source monetization strategies align pricing with the value customers receive, not just with usage or cost metrics.
4. Consider Time-to-Value
The faster users can implement your open source edition and see results, the more likely they are to convert to paying customers. Invest in documentation, quick-start guides, and intuitive interfaces.
5. Balance Community and Commercial Interests
Successful observability vendors like Elastic and MongoDB have shown that maintaining a thriving open source community while building a sustainable business requires constant attention to both constituencies.
Real-World Pricing Examples
Looking at successful observability platforms provides insights into effective pricing strategies:
Grafana Labs offers their core visualization platform as open source while monetizing cloud hosting, enterprise plugins, and support. This approach has helped them achieve widespread adoption while building a profitable business.
Elastic provides their basic stack as open source but reserves security features, machine learning capabilities, and cloud management for paying customers. Their tiered approach allows users to start small and grow their investment as needs evolve.
New Relic shifted to a consumption-based pricing model in 2020, moving away from host-based pricing that was common in the APM market. This approach aligns costs with actual usage and provides flexibility for customers with variable workloads.
Conclusion
There is no one-size-fits-all approach to pricing open source observability platforms. The right strategy depends on your target market, competitive landscape, and long-term business objectives. However, the most successful vendors share certain traits: they provide genuine value in their open source editions, maintain transparent pricing, and ensure a smooth journey from free to paid tiers.
For observability platform vendors, the key is finding the balance between fostering community adoption and building a sustainable business model. By carefully considering the value your platform provides and aligning your pricing accordingly, you can create a win-win scenario where users get powerful tools and your business thrives in the competitive monitoring and observability market.
As organizations continue to prioritize observability in their technology stacks, vendors who strike this balance will be well-positioned for long-term success in this growing market segment.