
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of the gaming industry, Software as a Service (SaaS) companies are revolutionizing how games are developed, monetized, and scaled. One of the most significant shifts we're witnessing is the move toward player-based and engagement pricing models. These innovative approaches are changing the economics of gaming while creating more sustainable relationships between developers and their audiences.
Traditional gaming revenue models relied heavily on one-time purchases or subscription fees that weren't necessarily tied to actual usage or player engagement. However, as the industry has matured, gaming SaaS providers have recognized the need for more flexible, usage-based pricing structures that align costs with actual value delivered.
According to a recent report by Newzoo, the global games market will generate $189.3 billion in 2023, with software services representing an increasingly significant portion of that revenue. This growth is partly fueled by innovative pricing models that better reflect how games are actually consumed.
Player-based pricing is exactly what it sounds like: a pricing model where gaming SaaS companies charge based on the number of active players using their platform or tools. This approach has several key advantages:
"Player-based pricing creates a partnership between gaming SaaS providers and game developers," explains Chris Benjaminsen, CTO of game development platform PlayCanvas. "When our customers succeed in attracting players, we succeed too."
While player-based models focus on raw user numbers, engagement pricing takes a more nuanced approach by measuring how deeply players interact with the game. Metrics might include:
Unity, one of the leading game development platforms, has begun implementing aspects of this model with its Unity Gaming Services, charging based on engagement metrics rather than flat fees. This ensures that developers who create highly engaging experiences are rewarded accordingly.
The shift toward these dynamic pricing models is visible across the gaming SaaS landscape:
Companies like PlayFab (acquired by Microsoft) and Amazon GameLift now offer pricing tiers based on monthly active users (MAU) or daily active users (DAU), allowing developers to pay only for the infrastructure they actually need.
Analytics platforms such as GameAnalytics have adopted tiered pricing models that scale with player numbers, providing advanced features as games grow their audience.
While many game engines still use traditional licensing models, companies like Unity and Unreal are increasingly incorporating usage-based components in their pricing structures.
According to Paul Bettner, founder of Playful Studios: "The alignment of incentives created by player-based pricing has changed our relationship with service providers from transactional to truly collaborative."
For game developers, these new pricing approaches offer several advantages:
"When we launched our indie studio, player-based pricing models allowed us to access enterprise-grade tools that would have been completely out of reach with traditional licensing," shares Maria Chen, founder of Pixel Dreams Studio.
For gaming SaaS companies looking to implement these models, several considerations are critical:
While these pricing models offer numerous benefits, they're not without challenges:
Looking ahead, we can expect further evolution in how gaming SaaS companies structure their pricing:
Player-based and engagement pricing models represent a fundamental shift in how the gaming industry approaches SaaS economics. By aligning the success of service providers with game developers, these models foster more collaborative relationships while making advanced game development tools accessible to creators at every scale.
For game developers, the message is clear: evaluate not just the features and capabilities of gaming SaaS platforms, but also how their pricing structures align with your growth trajectory and business model. For SaaS providers, embracing these flexible pricing approaches may be essential to remaining competitive in an increasingly sophisticated market.
As the gaming industry continues to expand and evolve, those who can master the balance between value delivery and fair compensation will be best positioned to thrive in this dynamic ecosystem.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.