.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the evolving landscape of construction technology, pricing models can significantly impact both software providers and construction companies. Traditional subscription models are giving way to more flexible approaches, with job-based pricing emerging as a particularly relevant option for the construction industry. This pricing strategy aligns software costs directly with project activities—potentially offering better value and greater predictability for construction firms managing variable workloads.
The Construction SaaS Landscape: Current Challenges
The construction industry faces unique software challenges that don't always fit neatly into standard SaaS pricing models. Construction projects are inherently temporary, with teams forming and disbanding as projects begin and complete. This creates several pain points:
- Inconsistent user bases: Construction teams expand and contract based on active projects
- Seasonal variations: Many construction companies experience significant workflow fluctuations
- Project-based budgeting: Construction firms typically allocate technology costs to specific projects rather than overhead
- ROI justification: Traditional monthly subscriptions can be difficult to justify when projects have defined lifecycles
According to a McKinsey report on construction digitization, the industry has been historically slower to adopt software solutions compared to other sectors—with pricing models being a significant barrier to implementation.
What Is Job-Based Pricing in Construction SaaS?
Job-based pricing represents a fundamental shift in how construction software is monetized. Rather than charging per user or for unlimited access, this model ties costs directly to projects (jobs).
Key Components of Job-Based Pricing
- Project-centric billing: Charges apply to specific construction projects rather than organization-wide subscriptions
- Scalable costs: Pricing scales with project size, complexity, duration, or value
- Defined timeframes: Costs align with project timelines, not arbitrary billing cycles
- Value-based correlation: Software costs correlate more directly with the value derived
Procore, one of the leading construction project management platforms, has experienced significant growth partly due to implementing a job-based pricing structure that resonates with how construction companies operate and budget.
Why Job-Based Pricing Works for Construction Project Management
The construction industry operates fundamentally differently from many other sectors, making job-based pricing particularly advantageous:
Better Alignment with Project Lifecycles
Construction projects have defined beginnings and endings. Job-based pricing mirrors this reality by allowing companies to pay for software only during active projects. According to Construction Dive's technology adoption survey, 67% of construction professionals prefer technology solutions that align with their project-based workflows.
Simplified Budget Allocation
Construction project managers typically work with discrete budgets for each job. Job-based pricing makes it straightforward to allocate software costs as direct project expenses rather than overhead. This improves transparency and cost control—critical factors in an industry where margins average only 2-8% according to industry analysts.
Accommodating Project Variability
A regional contractor might simultaneously manage a $50 million commercial development and several small residential renovations. Job-based pricing allows the software cost to scale appropriately with each project's scope and requirements.
Enhanced ROI Visibility
When software costs are directly tied to specific projects, measuring return on investment becomes more straightforward. Construction executives can more easily evaluate whether the technology delivered value on completed projects.
Implementation Models for Job-Based Pricing
Construction SaaS providers have developed several approaches to job-based pricing:
Project Value Percentage
Some platforms charge a small percentage of the total project contract value (typically 0.1-0.5%). This model automatically scales with project size and directly links software cost to project value.
Tiered Project Brackets
This approach categorizes projects into tiers based on dollar value, square footage, or complexity, with corresponding fixed prices for each tier. For example:
- Small projects (under $1M): $X per project
- Medium projects ($1M-$5M): $Y per project
- Large projects ($5M+): $Z per project
Hybrid Approaches
Many construction SaaS providers are implementing hybrid models that combine:
- A base platform fee
- Job-based charges for active projects
- Optional per-user fees for specialized roles
BuilderTrend, a prominent residential construction management platform, uses a hybrid approach with core functionality priced per project and premium features available as add-ons.
Case Study: Improved Software Adoption Through Job-Based Pricing
A mid-sized commercial contractor with 15-20 active projects annually implemented a job-based pricing model with their project management SaaS provider. The results were compelling:
- Increased adoption: Project managers more willingly utilized software when costs were allocated directly to their projects
- Expanded implementation: The company deployed comprehensive software features on more projects
- Improved project outcomes: More consistent software usage led to better documentation, fewer RFIs, and reduced rework
- Better cost control: Technology expenses became more predictable and directly tied to revenue-generating activities
After transitioning to job-based pricing, the contractor reported a 32% increase in software utilization across projects and a 15% reduction in administrative overhead related to project documentation.
Implementation Challenges and Solutions
While job-based pricing offers significant advantages, construction companies and software providers should consider potential challenges:
Accurate Project Scoping
Challenge: Defining project parameters that determine pricing can be complex, especially for projects with evolving scopes.
Solution: Establish clear metrics for project categorization (contract value, duration, square footage) and processes for handling change orders that might affect pricing tiers.
Integration with Existing Systems
Challenge: Job-based pricing may require integration with project management and accounting systems to properly allocate costs.
Solution: Prioritize construction SaaS platforms with robust API capabilities for connecting with existing construction management software and ERP systems.
Value Demonstration
Challenge: Stakeholders may require more concrete evidence of ROI before adopting new pricing models.
Solution: Begin with pilot projects that carefully track key performance indicators before and after implementation to demonstrate tangible benefits.
The Future of Construction SaaS Pricing
The construction technology market continues to evolve rapidly. Emerging trends in job-based pricing include:
- AI-driven value pricing: Using artificial intelligence to predict potential cost savings and price software based on projected value
- Outcome-based models: Tying portions of software costs to measurable project outcomes like schedule adherence or safety performance
- Consortium pricing: Multiple contractors on large projects sharing platform costs proportionally
According to construction technology investment reports, funding for construction SaaS solutions has grown by over 30% annually for the past three years, with platforms offering flexible pricing models receiving disproportionately higher investment.
Is Job-Based Pricing Right for Your Construction Business?
When evaluating whether job-based pricing makes sense for your construction firm, consider these factors:
- Project portfolio diversity: Companies with highly variable project sizes tend to benefit most
- Technology budget structure: If you already allocate technology costs to projects, job-based pricing will fit your existing processes
- Cash flow considerations: Job-based pricing can help match software expenses with project revenue
- Implementation timeline: Consider how pricing structures affect your ability to deploy software across multiple projects
Construction firms should engage directly with SaaS providers to discuss customized pricing models that reflect their specific project portfolios and business models.
Conclusion: Aligning Software Costs with Construction Realities
Job-based pricing represents a significant evolution in construction SaaS, creating better alignment between software costs and the project-centric nature of the industry. By directly connecting technology expenses to revenue-generating activities, this pricing model offers construction companies greater flexibility, improved budget control, and a clearer path to demonstrating ROI.
As construction technology continues its rapid evolution, expect to see more sophisticated and flexible pricing models emerge that further emphasize value creation over arbitrary subscription timelines. Forward-thinking construction companies are already embracing these new approaches, gaining competitive advantages through more strategic technology investments aligned with their project-based operations.