
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's data-driven business environment, companies increasingly rely on Business Intelligence (BI) tools to transform raw data into actionable insights. Yet for vendors offering these solutions, one question remains particularly challenging: how do you effectively price advanced analytics features within an open core model?
This pricing conundrum affects both vendors seeking sustainable revenue and customers evaluating the true value proposition of BI investments. Let's explore the strategies, considerations, and best practices for pricing advanced analytics capabilities in open core business intelligence platforms.
The open core model combines a free, open-source foundation with premium, proprietary features available through paid subscriptions. This approach has gained significant traction in the BI space, with tools like Metabase, Redash, and Superset offering robust free versions while reserving advanced capabilities for paying customers.
For vendors, the challenge lies in determining which analytics features belong in the free core versus the paid tier—and how to price those premium features appropriately to maximize both adoption and revenue.
When developing a pricing structure for advanced analytics features, consider these critical factors:
The most effective approach ties pricing directly to the business value delivered. Features that demonstrably impact revenue, reduce costs, or improve efficiency typically command higher prices. For example:
According to Gartner's research, organizations implementing advanced analytics features report an average 15-25% improvement in operational efficiency, providing a clear benchmark for value-based pricing conversations.
Your pricing strategy must account for market positioning relative to competitors:
A competitive analysis should identify feature-by-feature comparisons to help position your premium offerings appropriately within the market landscape.
Different user personas value analytics features differently:
Your pricing tiers should reflect these differing needs, with specialized features priced according to the willingness to pay among different user segments.
Several proven approaches exist for monetizing advanced analytics features:
Usage-based models tie costs directly to value received, charging based on:
This model works particularly well for resource-intensive features like real-time analytics, where usage correlates directly with infrastructure costs and delivered value.
This approach organizes advanced capabilities into logical tiers:
According to a 2022 OpenView Partners survey, SaaS companies with well-defined feature tiers saw 32% higher average contract values than those with less structured approaches.
This traditional model scales with organizational adoption:
Many successful BI vendors combine user-based pricing with feature tiers for maximum flexibility.
Based on market analysis and successful vendor approaches, these best practices emerge:
The distinction between free and paid features must be immediately apparent and value-based. Avoid arbitrary limitations that feel punitive rather than logical. Features appropriate for the premium tier typically include:
Customers appreciate clear pricing that grows with their needs. Consider:
According to research by TrustRadius, 87% of B2B buyers prefer self-service options during their evaluation process, and transparent pricing is a key factor in building trust.
The open core model thrives when users can experience value before committing to purchases:
Successful BI vendors often allow users to see premium visualizations or analytics results with watermarks or limited exports, creating desire for the full capability.
Several pricing missteps can undermine an otherwise strong open core BI strategy:
When essential features that users expect in any modern BI tool are restricted to paid tiers, adoption suffers and community goodwill erodes. The open core should deliver genuine standalone value.
When pricing requires a spreadsheet to calculate, you've gone too far. Complexity creates friction in the buying process and reduces conversion rates.
Enterprise BI purchases often involve multiple stakeholders with different concerns. Your pricing and packaging must address security, compliance, and governance requirements that matter to enterprise buyers, not just analytical capabilities.
Metabase, a popular open-source BI tool, exemplifies effective open core pricing. Their approach includes:
This balanced approach has enabled Metabase to build a thriving open-source community while generating sustainable revenue from organizations that need advanced capabilities.
Pricing advanced analytics features in an open core BI tool requires balancing multiple considerations: the value delivered to customers, competitive positioning, user needs, and your own business goals. The most successful approaches maintain a genuinely valuable free offering while creating clear, value-based differentiation for premium features.
By focusing on transparent, value-based pricing that aligns with customer success metrics, BI vendors can build sustainable businesses around open core models. Remember that pricing is not static—regularly revisit your approach based on customer feedback, usage patterns, and evolving market conditions.
As the business intelligence market continues to mature, those who find the right balance between openness and monetization will be positioned to capture market share while building vibrant user communities around their products.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.