.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Open source software has revolutionized the SaaS industry, fostering innovation and collaboration. However, when competitors fork your open source project and directly compete with your business, it can threaten your competitive advantage and revenue streams. This challenge has led many open source SaaS companies to reconsider their approach to licensing and business strategy.
Understanding the Open Source Forking Challenge
Open source forking occurs when someone takes a copy of your source code, modifies it, and creates a competing product. While forking is a fundamental right in open source communities, it can become problematic when well-funded competitors use your code without contributing back or when cloud providers offer your software as a managed service without sharing revenue.
According to a 2022 survey by the Open Source Initiative, 67% of open source business founders cite competitive forking as one of their top three business concerns.
Building a Competitive Moat Around Your Open Source SaaS
Strategic Licensing Choices
Your licensing strategy forms the foundation of your defense against problematic forks. Several approaches have emerged:
1. Source Available Licensing
Source available licensing has gained popularity as a middle ground between fully open source and proprietary software. These licenses allow users to view the source code but place restrictions on how it can be used commercially.
Examples include:
- The Business Source License (BSL): Used by companies like Sentry and CockroachDB
- The Server Side Public License (SSPL): Adopted by MongoDB
- The Elastic License: Created by Elastic
According to Tidelift's 2023 Open Source Maintainer Survey, source available licensing adoption increased by 34% among commercial open source projects between 2021 and 2023.
2. Open Core Model
With this approach, your core functionality remains open source while advanced features are offered under commercial licenses. According to OpenLogic's 2023 State of Open Source Report, 58% of commercial open source companies now employ some version of the open core model.
This strategy allows you to maintain open source credibility while protecting your revenue streams. Companies like GitLab and HashiCorp have successfully implemented this approach.
Technical and Business Strategies
Beyond licensing, several technical and business strategies can strengthen your competitive moat:
1. Rapid Innovation Pace
Maintaining a fast development pace makes it difficult for forks to keep up. Continuous innovation ensures your original product remains superior to any forks.
2. Developer Experience and Community Building
A strong, loyal community creates significant switching costs. According to GitHub's 2023 Open Source Survey, projects with active communities have 73% fewer successful competitive forks.
Invest in:
- Comprehensive documentation
- Responsive support forums
- Regular community events
- Contributor recognition programs
3. Cloud-Optimized Services
Offer cloud-hosted versions with additional features and integrations that can't be easily replicated. According to Gartner, by 2025, over 70% of enterprises using open source software will prefer vendor-provided cloud offerings over self-managed deployments.
4. Trademark Protection
While code may be forkable, your brand isn't. Protect your name, logo, and brand identity through trademark registration. Redis Labs (now Redis Inc.) effectively used this strategy when cloud providers offered Redis-compatible services.
Real-World Examples of Successful Defensive Strategies
MongoDB's SSPL Approach
When major cloud providers began offering MongoDB as a service without sharing revenue, MongoDB responded by changing its license to the Server Side Public License (SSPL). This move required service providers to either share the source code of their entire service stack or negotiate a commercial license.
According to MongoDB's financial reports, following this licensing change, their Atlas cloud service revenue grew by 66% year-over-year in 2022.
Elastic's Dual-Licensing Strategy
Elastic adopted a dual-licensing approach, offering their software under both the Elastic License (source available) and SSPL. This change came after Amazon launched a competing service based on Elasticsearch.
Despite initial community concerns, Elastic reported a 42% increase in subscription revenue following the license change, demonstrating the financial benefits of their strategic pivot.
Finding the Right Balance for Your Business
There's no one-size-fits-all approach to preventing problematic forks. Consider these factors when developing your strategy:
Business maturity: Early-stage startups may benefit from more open approaches to gain adoption, while established companies might need stronger protections.
Market dynamics: Analyze competitor behavior and cloud provider strategies in your specific market segment.
Community values: Consider how licensing changes might impact your relationship with contributors and users.
Long-term vision: Ensure your approach aligns with your company's growth trajectory and exit strategy.
Conclusion
Building a sustainable open source SaaS business requires thoughtful balance between openness and business protection. By implementing strategic licensing choices, focusing on community development, maintaining rapid innovation, and creating technical differentiation, you can establish a competitive moat that discourages harmful forking while preserving the benefits of open source development.
The most successful open source SaaS companies don't just rely on licensing restrictions—they create compelling value that makes their offerings the obvious choice regardless of what competitors might fork. By combining legal protections with genuine market differentiation, you can build an open source business that remains resilient against competitive challenges.