
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's digital-first enterprise environment, managing an ever-expanding portfolio of SaaS applications has become a critical challenge for procurement and IT leaders. SaaS Management Platforms (SMPs) have emerged as essential tools for organizations seeking to optimize spending, ensure compliance, and maximize the value of their software investments. However, understanding SMP pricing models can be as complex as the problem they aim to solve.
If you're evaluating SMP solutions for your enterprise, this procurement guide will help you navigate the various pricing structures, identify potential hidden costs, and determine the best value for your organization's specific needs.
Many SMP vendors utilize a straightforward per-user pricing model, where you pay for each employee who will access the platform.
How it works:
Best suited for: Organizations with a clearly defined set of users who need SMP access, typically IT and procurement teams.
Potential drawback: This model can become expensive for large enterprises where widespread access might be beneficial.
Some SMP vendors price their solutions based on the number of SaaS applications being managed.
How it works:
Best suited for: Organizations with a moderate number of SaaS applications but a large employee base.
Potential drawback: As your SaaS portfolio grows, costs can escalate quickly, potentially discouraging comprehensive SaaS governance.
A model gaining popularity among enterprise-focused SMPs is spend-based pricing, where fees are calculated as a percentage of the managed SaaS spend.
How it works:
Best suited for: Large enterprises with significant SaaS budgets looking to align SMP costs with potential savings.
Potential drawback: This approach can result in higher absolute costs, though vendors argue the ROI justifies the investment.
Many enterprise SMPs employ hybrid pricing approaches that combine elements of the models above.
Common variations:
Enterprise SMP deployments typically require significant implementation work that may carry additional costs:
According to Gartner, implementation costs for enterprise SMP solutions can add 20-40% to first-year expenses.
SMP vendors typically segment their offerings into different tiers with increasing capabilities:
Basic tier: Often includes discovery, utilization monitoring, and basic spend analytics
Mid-tier: Adds license optimization, renewal management, and compliance features
Enterprise tier: Includes advanced capabilities like:
Enterprise SMP deployments generally include various support options that impact pricing:
According to a 2023 Deloitte survey on SaaS management, organizations that invested in premium support services reported 27% higher satisfaction with their SMP implementations.
When evaluating SMP solutions, be alert to these potential hidden costs:
Some vendors charge additional fees for:
Additional charges may apply for:
Pricing can vary significantly based on commitment length:
Be wary of initial proposals that exclude key features your organization may eventually need, leading to significant cost increases later.
While specific pricing is often customized for each enterprise, here are representative examples based on industry research:
Zylo: Often employs a spend-based model, typically charging 1-3% of managed SaaS spend with a minimum annual commitment. Implementation fees for enterprises typically range from $10,000-$30,000.
Productiv: Utilizes a hybrid model with per-application pricing plus user-based components for specific features. Enterprise implementations generally start around $50,000 annually.
BetterCloud: Offers tiered pricing based on both user counts and managed applications, with enterprise packages starting at approximately $30 per user annually with volume discounts.
Based on procurement benchmarks from Fortune 500 companies:
Bundle for discounts: Commit to multiple years and prepayment for 10-30% discounts
Leverage growth potential: Negotiate future pricing tiers in advance if you expect significant growth
Secure price caps: Limit annual increases to 3-5% to prevent unexpected cost escalations
Phase implementation: Start with core modules and expand over time to distribute costs
Include success metrics: Tie renewal terms to achieved outcomes (e.g., demonstrated cost savings)
When justifying SMP investments, procurement leaders typically focus on these value drivers:
Direct cost savings:
Risk mitigation value:
Operational efficiency:
According to Flexera's 2023 State of ITAM Report, organizations with mature SaaS management practices report an average 22% reduction in overall SaaS costs.
The ideal SMP pricing model for your enterprise depends on your organization's size, SaaS maturity, and management objectives. Large enterprises with hundreds of SaaS applications often find that spend-based models provide the most predictable value, while organizations with limited SaaS portfolios may benefit from application-based pricing.
When evaluating SMP solutions, look beyond the pricing model to consider the total value proposition, including the platform's ability to deliver tangible savings, improve security posture, and enhance productivity. The most valuable SMP partnership will be one where the vendor's incentives align with your organization's success metrics.
Remember that SaaS management is a journey, not a destination. The right SMP partner should offer a pricing structure that can evolve alongside your organization's SaaS governance maturity, providing increasing value as you expand your capabilities.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.