
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's interconnected business environment, enterprise software is undergoing a fundamental transformation. Traditional ownership models are giving way to collaborative consumption approaches that promise greater flexibility, reduced costs, and expanded access to critical business tools. This shift represents not just a pricing evolution, but a reimagining of how organizations acquire, deploy, and leverage software at scale.
Collaborative consumption in the enterprise software context refers to business models where multiple organizations share access to software resources instead of each company maintaining exclusive ownership. This approach creates economies of scale that benefit all participants through increased affordability and efficiency.
According to Gartner research, by 2025, over 60% of enterprises will participate in some form of shared software ecosystem, up from less than 30% in 2021. This dramatic increase reflects the compelling economics of these models and their ability to address common pain points in enterprise software deployment.
Multi-tenant SaaS has evolved beyond simple subscription models to incorporate cooperative pricing structures where costs decrease as community adoption increases. Companies like Slack and Microsoft have pioneered enterprise plans where per-user costs decline when certain thresholds of users across participating organizations are reached.
"We've seen a 22% reduction in our enterprise software costs since joining a cooperative purchasing alliance with other companies in our industry," notes Sarah Chen, CIO at Meridian Manufacturing. "These shared agreements give us enterprise-grade solutions we simply couldn't afford individually."
Industry-specific challenges often require specialized software solutions. Rather than each organization developing custom tools, industry consortiums are pooling resources to fund development of shared platforms.
The financial services sector provides a compelling example with the creation of the Financial Blockchain Consortium, where over 40 banks jointly funded the development of blockchain-based settlement systems. According to Deloitte, this approach reduced development costs by approximately 65% per institution while accelerating time-to-market by nearly 18 months.
Enterprise app exchanges represent another facet of collaborative consumption, creating ecosystems where organizations can both consume and contribute software components. Salesforce's AppExchange pioneered this model, but we now see expansion across many enterprise platforms.
These marketplaces foster collaboration between customers and vendors, creating communities that collectively improve the value of the core platform through shared innovations and integrations.
The most immediately apparent benefit of collaborative consumption models is cost reduction. By distributing software expenses across multiple organizations, the per-company cost drops significantly. IDC research indicates that participants in cooperative software procurement programs save an average of 27-34% compared to traditional licensing models.
Collaborative consumption democratizes access to sophisticated software that would otherwise remain out of reach for mid-market organizations. Through cooperative purchasing and shared resources, mid-sized companies can leverage the same powerful tools as their larger competitors.
"Before joining our industry's software sharing program, we simply couldn't afford the advanced analytics platform that now drives our key business decisions," explains Jeff Townsend, CEO of Riverton Manufacturing. "Collaborative consumption has effectively eliminated the software advantage that larger competitors previously held."
Beyond acquisition costs, shared models often distribute the burden of implementation and ongoing maintenance. In cooperative environments, the cost of upgrades, security patches, and system administration can be shared across the participant community.
McKinsey analysis shows that organizations participating in shared enterprise software arrangements typically reduce their IT operations overhead by 15-23% through collective support models and shared expertise.
Despite the compelling benefits, several challenges must be addressed when implementing shared software models:
Organizations naturally worry about data security and competitive exposure when entering shared software arrangements. Successful implementations require robust data partitioning, clear governance frameworks, and contractual protections.
Cooperative models require effective governance structures to manage decisions about feature priorities, upgrade timing, and resource allocation. Without clear frameworks, these arrangements can become unwieldy and inefficient.
Shared software must still integrate effectively with each organization's existing technology landscape and business processes. This challenge requires flexible APIs, robust integration capabilities, and sometimes custom connectors.
Consider these key questions when evaluating potential shared software arrangements:
Cost-Benefit Analysis: How do the economics compare to traditional licensing across a 3-5 year horizon?
Control Requirements: Which aspects of the software require your direct control versus those that can be standardized?
Competitive Differentiation: Does this software represent a source of competitive advantage (suggesting traditional licensing) or a necessary but non-differentiating capability (ideal for shared models)?
Governance Comfort: Is your organization comfortable with the collaborative decision-making required in shared arrangements?
Security Requirements: Can your security and compliance needs be adequately addressed in a shared environment?
Looking ahead, collaborative consumption models will likely expand in both scope and sophistication. We're seeing early evidence of cross-industry consortiums forming to address common challenges like cybersecurity, sustainability compliance, and AI development.
Blockchain and smart contract technology promise to further streamline these arrangements by automating license management, usage tracking, and cost allocation. These advances will reduce administration overhead and make collaborative models viable for an even broader range of enterprise software categories.
Collaborative consumption represents a significant evolution in how organizations acquire and leverage enterprise software. By sharing resources, costs, and sometimes development efforts, businesses can access more powerful tools at lower costs while reducing administrative burdens.
While not appropriate for every software category—particularly those representing core competitive advantages—shared models are increasingly compelling for commodity business functions and industry-standard processes. Organizations that thoughtfully incorporate collaborative consumption into their software strategy can realize significant cost advantages while maintaining access to cutting-edge capabilities.
As you evaluate your enterprise software portfolio, consider which applications might benefit from shared approaches versus those requiring traditional deployment models. The right balance can dramatically improve both your technology capabilities and your bottom line.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.