.png)
Estd 4.22.2023
In the competitive landscape of SaaS, pricing strategy remains one of the most powerful—yet often underutilized—levers for growth. The Good-Better-Best (GBB) pricing model has long been the standard bearer, offering customers three distinct service tiers that cater to different needs and budgets. But as the SaaS marketplace evolves and customer expectations shift, is this tried-and-true approach still effective? Let's examine whether this classic pricing structure continues to deliver results in today's dynamic environment.
The Enduring Appeal of Good-Better-Best
The GBB model has become ubiquitous across SaaS for good reason. According to research from Price Intelligently, companies implementing a three-tier structure see an average 30% increase in revenue compared to single-price offerings. The model elegantly solves several fundamental pricing challenges:
Customer Segmentation Made Simple: The three-tier structure naturally segments users based on willingness to pay, allowing companies to capture value across different customer profiles without complex configurations.
Decision Simplification: By presenting just three options, GBB reduces choice paralysis while still providing options. A study by Harvard Business Review found that conversion rates typically increase by 20% when customers face three choices versus ten or more.
The Powerful Middle Option: The "Better" tier creates an anchoring effect, directing most customers toward a middle price point that often maximizes revenue. Data from Profitwell indicates that 60-70% of customers typically select the middle tier when presented with a three-tier model.
Signs of Strain in the Traditional Model
Despite its historical success, the GBB approach shows signs of strain in today's SaaS environment:
Evolving Customer Expectations
Modern SaaS customers increasingly expect personalization. According to McKinsey, 71% of consumers expect companies to deliver personalized interactions, and 76% get frustrated when this doesn't happen. The rigid three-tier system can feel outdated compared to more flexible approaches.
Feature Bloat and Artificial Limitations
Many SaaS companies have fallen into the trap of artificially restricting features to justify tier differences, creating what industry expert Patrick Campbell calls "feature walls" rather than genuine value differentiators. This approach risks creating customer resentment when limitations feel arbitrary rather than value-based.
Competitive Pressure and Value Metrics
As markets mature, competitors often converge on similar three-tier structures, making differentiation difficult. According to OpenView Partners' 2022 SaaS Pricing Survey, companies that price based on unique value metrics outperform those using standard tiered approaches by 25% in revenue growth.
Modern Adaptations of the Classic Model
Forward-thinking SaaS companies are evolving the GBB approach rather than abandoning it entirely:
Usage-Based Components: Incorporating consumption elements alongside tiers creates more flexible models. Mixpanel, for example, offers three core plans but adds usage-based pricing for event data, allowing customers to scale costs with actual value received.
Value Metric Alignment: Successful companies now align their tiers around customer-centric value metrics rather than arbitrary feature groupings. HubSpot's pricing ties directly to contact database size—a direct measure of the value customers extract from the platform.
Expanded Options with Clarity: Some companies now offer more than three tiers but maintain clarity through guided selection. Salesforce provides multiple service levels but uses intelligent recommendation engines to guide prospects to appropriate options based on their specific needs.
When GBB Still Works Brilliantly
The three-tier model remains particularly effective in certain scenarios:
Market Education Phase: For newer categories where customers are still learning about solution value, simple three-tier options provide educational guideposts without overwhelming prospects.
SMB-Focused Solutions: Small and mid-sized business customers often appreciate the clarity and simplicity of distinct packages with predictable pricing.
Narrow Use-Case Products: Tools with focused functionality benefit from the straightforward communication that GBB enables, particularly when feature sets are naturally segmented by user sophistication.
Implementation Best Practices for Today's Market
For executives considering or refining a GBB approach, these strategies enhance effectiveness:
Test Tier Naming Beyond "Basic/Standard/Premium": Names should reflect genuine value propositions rather than generic labels. According to testing by ProfitWell, value-oriented tier names can increase conversion rates by up to 15%.
Establish Clear Value Jumps: Each tier should deliver at least 2-3x the value of the previous tier to justify price increases, according to pricing expert Lincoln Murphy.
Offer Customization Within Tiers: Provide add-ons or modularity within each tier to maintain the simplicity of three options while accommodating specific needs.
Regularly Audit Value Alignment: Continuously validate that tier features align with actual customer usage patterns and value perception, not internal cost structures.
The Verdict: Evolution, Not Extinction
The GBB model isn't obsolete—it's evolving. According to data from Paddle's 2023 SaaS pricing survey, 68% of high-growth SaaS companies still use some variation of tiered pricing, though pure three-tier implementations have decreased from 75% to 55% since 2018.
The most successful implementations now blend the clarity of the three-tier approach with flexible components that adapt to changing customer needs. Rather than rigid "Good-Better-Best" frameworks, think "Core-Growth-Enterprise" with modular options that recognize the complexity of today's SaaS environments.
As you evaluate your pricing strategy, the key question isn't whether to use a three-tier approach, but how to adapt this proven framework to deliver genuine value in ways that resonate with your specific market. The companies seeing the greatest success are those that view pricing as a dynamic, customer-centric element of their value proposition rather than a static structure.
In the end, good pricing—whether in three tiers or another configuration—remains fundamentally about aligning your solution's value with customer needs in a way that's clear, fair, and profitable. That principle will never go out of style, even as its implementation continues to evolve.