.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of music technology, generative AI is creating both unprecedented opportunities and complex challenges for the music industry. For SaaS executives tracking emerging revenue models, understanding the intersection of AI-generated music, intellectual property rights, and monetization frameworks has become essential. This article explores how the pricing models for AI-generated music are developing alongside traditional streaming economics, and what these shifts mean for technology leaders.
The Rise of AI Music Generation
Generative AI music tools have advanced dramatically in recent years, with platforms like OpenAI's Musenet, Google's MusicLM, and Suno AI creating increasingly sophisticated compositions that can mimic genres, artists, and even emotional qualities with remarkable accuracy. Unlike traditional music production, which relies on human composers, musicians, and recording engineers, these AI systems can produce complete compositions in seconds based on text prompts or musical seeds.
According to a 2023 Goldman Sachs report, AI-generated music is projected to account for approximately 5% of the global music market by 2027, representing over $1.2 billion in revenue. This rapid growth is forcing the industry to reconsider fundamental questions about ownership, rights management, and value distribution.
Composition Rights: The New Frontier
Training Data and Copyright Concerns
At the heart of the GenAI music pricing debate lies a critical question: Who owns the rights to AI-generated music?
Traditional composition rights are straightforward—human creators own their work and can license it accordingly. However, AI-generated music introduces multiple stakeholders:
- AI Platform Developers who create and deploy the generative systems
- Original Artists whose work was used in training datasets
- End Users who prompt the AI and use the resulting output
- Potentially the AI itself (though current legal frameworks don't recognize non-human authors)
Major music labels including Universal Music Group, Sony Music, and Warner Music Group have taken strong positions on this issue. In 2023, Universal Music Group successfully demanded the removal of an AI-generated song that mimicked Drake and The Weeknd from streaming platforms, citing copyright infringement.
Current Licensing Models for AI Music
Several distinct models have emerged for pricing and licensing AI-generated compositions:
Subscription-Based Access
Platforms like AIVA and Soundraw offer tiered subscription models ranging from $15 to $240 monthly, providing users with rights to use generated music in various contexts. Higher tiers typically include commercial usage rights and more customization options.
One-Time Purchases
Companies such as Artlist AI and Shutterstock's AI music offerings sell perpetual licenses for single compositions, primarily targeting content creators and marketing professionals with pricing between $49 and $299 per track.
Royalty-Free Models
Some platforms like Loudly AI have pioneered completely royalty-free models where users pay once and can use compositions across multiple projects without additional payments—a significant departure from traditional music licensing.
Streaming Revenue Distribution: A Broken System?
The streaming revenue model for traditional music is already controversial, with artists receiving between $0.003 and $0.005 per stream on mainstream platforms like Spotify. As AI-generated music enters these ecosystems, the economics become even more complex.
Current Streaming Economics
According to recent data from the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), streaming now accounts for 84% of recorded music revenue in the United States, generating $13.3 billion annually. However, this revenue is distributed through a "pro-rata" system that many critics consider fundamentally flawed.
The standard streaming formula works as follows:
- All streaming revenue is pooled together
- Each rights holder receives a percentage based on their share of total streams
- This favors high-volume, major label artists over niche creators
As AI systems begin generating thousands of tracks daily, this model faces significant pressure. Some platforms have already detected attempts to game the system with AI-generated content designed to accumulate passive streaming income.
Emerging Models for AI Music Streaming
Several alternative approaches are being developed to address these challenges:
User-Centric Payment Systems (UCPS)
Platforms like SoundCloud and Deezer have begun experimenting with systems where subscription fees from each user are distributed only among the artists they personally stream—potentially a more equitable model as AI music proliferates.
Split Rights Frameworks
Companies including Endel and Boomy are pioneering hybrid models where streaming revenue is shared between the AI platform, the user who prompted the creation, and a pool for artists whose work influenced the AI system.
Blockchain-Based Solutions
Audius and other Web3 music platforms are implementing blockchain technology to create transparent, immutable records of rights and automatically distribute micropayments to all stakeholders through smart contracts.
Key Considerations for SaaS Executives
For technology leaders monitoring or entering this space, several strategic considerations emerge:
Legal Risk Management
The legal landscape for AI-generated music remains highly unsettled. Prudent SaaS companies are implementing:
- Clear terms of service regarding ownership and usage rights
- Proper documentation of training data sources and licensing
- Indemnification clauses protecting against infringement claims
- Regular monitoring of evolving case law and regulation
Pricing Strategy Development
Successful GenAI music platforms are designing pricing models that:
- Reflect the reduced production costs compared to human-created music
- Account for different usage contexts (personal, commercial, synchronization)
- Include mechanisms for compensating original artists whose work influenced the AI
- Balance accessibility with sustainable revenue generation
The Path Forward: Hybrid Models and Collaborative Approaches
The most promising developments in this space involve collaborative approaches between AI developers, traditional music industry stakeholders, and technology platforms.
In early 2023, Spotify introduced "Discovery Mode," allowing artists (human or AI) to accept a lower royalty rate in exchange for algorithmic promotion—an early example of how streaming platforms might differentiate between traditional and AI-generated content.
Meanwhile, Universal Music Group has partnered with AI music platform Endel to develop frameworks for ethically produced AI music that properly compensates human creators while embracing technological innovation.
Conclusion: Preparing for an AI-Driven Music Economy
As GenAI music continues its rapid evolution, SaaS executives should prepare for significant disruption in how music is created, licensed, distributed, and monetized. The companies that will thrive in this environment will be those that develop ethical, transparent approaches to rights management while creating sustainable economic models that fairly value all contributors in the creative process.
The most successful platforms will likely implement hybrid models that recognize the unique nature of AI-generated content while respecting the human creative work that makes such generation possible. For SaaS leaders, staying informed about these evolving models isn't just about market intelligence—it's about participating responsibly in shaping the future of creative expression.