
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's data-driven SaaS landscape, continuous experimentation has become the gold standard for optimizing pricing strategies. Companies run A/B tests on pricing pages, test various tiering structures, and experiment with different value metrics—all in pursuit of the perfect pricing model. However, beneath this culture of relentless experimentation lurks a significant yet rarely discussed challenge: experiment fatigue.
This phenomenon occurs when organizations conduct so many pricing experiments that they create organizational exhaustion, customer confusion, and ultimately diminishing returns on their testing efforts. For SaaS executives, recognizing when to pause the experimentation flywheel and consolidate learnings is becoming just as crucial as knowing when to initiate new experiments.
The appeal of pricing experimentation is undeniable. According to research from Price Intelligently, a mere 1% improvement in pricing can yield an 11% increase in operating profit. With such compelling economics, many SaaS companies have developed what amounts to an experimentation addiction.
"We've observed companies running upwards of 15 different pricing experiments simultaneously across various segments," notes Patrick Campbell, CEO of ProfitWell. "At that volume, the ability to properly analyze results and implement meaningful changes becomes severely compromised."
This addiction typically follows a predictable pattern:
How can you tell if your organization is approaching or experiencing experiment fatigue? The following indicators should prompt a reassessment:
When customers encounter frequent pricing changes or inconsistent offers, it erodes trust. According to a study by Salesforce, 73% of customers expect companies to understand their needs and expectations. Constantly shifting pricing structures directly contradicts this expectation.
Intercom's Director of Pricing, Alicia Carney, observed: "We noticed that when we ran more than two pricing experiments per quarter, our customer satisfaction scores around pricing transparency began to decline. Customers felt like they couldn't keep up with our changes."
Your revenue and product teams may show signs of experiment fatigue before your metrics do:
Perhaps the most telling sign is when your experiments start yielding contradictory results. When one experiment suggests raising prices while another indicates the opposite, you may have reached a point of diminishing returns in your testing strategy.
When these warning signs appear, it's time to pause and consolidate. But what exactly does pricing consolidation entail?
Begin by cataloging all pricing experiments conducted over the past 18-24 months. For each experiment, document:
This audit often reveals surprising patterns. Jonathan Becher, former CMO at SAP, shared: "When we audited our pricing experiments, we discovered we'd actually tested similar hypotheses three separate times under different leadership, with each team unaware of the others' work."
Once you've compiled your experiment inventory, look for consistent patterns that point to fundamental truths about your pricing model. These might include:
Using these foundational truths, develop a comprehensive pricing framework that aligns with your company's long-term strategy and customer value proposition.
Tomasz Tunguz, managing director at Redpoint Ventures, recommends: "The best pricing frameworks are simple enough for the entire company to understand but sophisticated enough to capture the nuances of customer value perception."
To prevent future experiment fatigue, establish clear governance around pricing changes:
Atlassian provides an instructive example of effective pricing consolidation. After years of running various pricing experiments across their product suite, they noticed increasing customer confusion and internal complexity.
In response, they initiated a comprehensive pricing review that resulted in their "Good, Better, Best" model—a simplified framework applied consistently across products. While this represented a significant shift, it was based on consolidated learnings from years of experimentation.
Scott Farquhar, co-founder and co-CEO of Atlassian, explained: "We realized we'd learned enough about our customers' valuation of different capabilities to confidently move to a more consistent model. This wasn't abandoning experimentation—it was the culmination of it."
The results were compelling:
After a consolidation phase, how do you know when to resume more active experimentation? Consider these triggers:
The most sophisticated SaaS companies have learned to balance periods of active experimentation with consolidation phases. This balanced approach requires:
The pursuit of optimal pricing isn't a sprint but a marathon. While continuous experimentation provides valuable data points, sustainable pricing evolution requires rhythms of testing and consolidation.
By recognizing the signs of experiment fatigue, pausing to consolidate learnings, and approaching pricing as a long-term strategic capability, SaaS executives can avoid the pitfalls of over-experimentation while still capturing the tremendous value of effective pricing.
As you evaluate your own company's approach to pricing experiments, consider whether you might be overdue for a consolidation phase. The most valuable pricing insights often emerge not from running new experiments, but from thoughtfully synthesizing what you've already learned.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.