.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the evolving landscape of web development, headless content management systems (CMS) have become essential tools for developers seeking flexible content infrastructure. As API-first platforms continue to gain popularity within the JAMstack ecosystem, choosing the right headless CMS can significantly impact both your workflow and budget.
This comparison focuses on three leading contenders—Contentful, Strapi, and Sanity—with a specific emphasis on their pricing models from a developer's perspective. Whether you're a freelancer watching costs or part of a development team evaluating long-term technology investments, understanding these pricing structures will help you make an informed decision.
What Is a Headless CMS?
Before diving into prices, let's clarify what makes these systems unique. A headless CMS decouples content management from content presentation, delivering your content via APIs rather than through predetermined templates. This separation gives developers unprecedented freedom in content delivery while providing content creators with user-friendly interfaces.
Contentful Pricing: Enterprise-Grade with a Cost
Contentful positions itself as an enterprise-level content platform with pricing that reflects its robust capabilities.
Free Tier
- Community plan with limited content entries (approximately 25,000)
- 2 locales
- 2 user seats
- Basic content modeling
- Basic content delivery API
Team Tier ($489/month billed annually)
- 48,000 content entries
- 5 locales
- 10 user seats
- Expanded roles and permissions
- Custom roles
- Content workflows
Enterprise Tier (Custom pricing)
- Unlimited content entries
- Unlimited environments
- Custom SLAs
- Single sign-on
- Premium support
Contentful's pricing structure makes it more accessible for companies with substantial budgets, but potentially challenging for individual developers or startups with limited resources. The considerable jump from free to paid tiers may create a decision point for growing projects.
Strapi Pricing: Open-Source Flexibility
Strapi stands out with its open-source foundation, offering a different approach to pricing.
Free (Self-Hosted)
- Completely free and open-source
- Unlimited API calls
- Self-hosting required
- Community support
- Plugin ecosystem
Cloud Tier ($9/month per seat)
- Managed hosting
- Content versioning
- Roles and permissions
- User management
- Community support
Enterprise Tier (Custom pricing)
- Custom roles
- SSO authentication
- Enterprise support
- Custom SLA
- Dedicated environment
Strapi's self-hosted option provides maximum flexibility for budget-conscious developers comfortable managing their own infrastructure. The reasonable per-seat pricing for cloud options makes it approachable for growing teams.
Sanity Pricing: Developer-Friendly Scaling
Sanity offers a pricing model that scales based on usage, with generous free allowances.
Free Tier
- 3 users
- 100K API requests monthly
- 10GB bandwidth
- 5GB assets storage
- GROQ and GraphQL API
Team Tier ($99/month)
- 5 users
- 1M API requests monthly
- 100GB bandwidth
- 100GB assets storage
- Enhanced support
Business Tier ($949/month)
- 25 users
- 10M API requests monthly
- 1TB bandwidth
- 1TB assets storage
- Priority support
Sanity's model is particularly attractive for developers who want to start small but need room to grow. The free tier is genuinely useful for production projects, with clear upgrade paths as your needs increase.
Developer Experience Considerations Beyond Price
While pricing is important, several other factors affect the total cost of ownership and developer satisfaction:
Learning Curve
- Contentful: Steeper learning curve but comprehensive documentation
- Strapi: Moderate learning curve with familiar REST API patterns
- Sanity: Unique query language (GROQ) requires some adjustment but offers powerful capabilities
Content Delivery Performance
- Contentful: Global CDN included in all plans
- Strapi: Requires separate CDN configuration
- Sanity: Global CDN with all plans
Customization Options
- Contentful: Limited backend customization, extensive app marketplace
- Strapi: Highly customizable backend (Node.js)
- Sanity: Customizable through plugins and React components
Making the Right Choice for Your Project
Best for Bootstrapped Projects and Individual Developers
Strapi's self-hosted option offers the most economical path for developers with the technical expertise to manage their own infrastructure. With no usage limits and complete control, it provides maximum flexibility for minimal cost.
Best for Growing Startups
Sanity's generous free tier and gradual scaling make it ideal for projects with uncertain growth trajectories. You can start without committing significant resources and scale as your needs evolve.
Best for Enterprise Requirements
Contentful's robust governance features, workflows, and enterprise-grade support make it appropriate for larger organizations where content management involves multiple teams and complex approval processes.
Conclusion: Balancing Budget with Requirements
The ideal headless CMS choice depends on your specific project requirements, technical expertise, and budget constraints. For developers prioritizing cost:
- Strapi offers the lowest entry cost through its open-source model but requires infrastructure management expertise
- Sanity provides the most developer-friendly free tier with room to grow
- Contentful carries premium pricing but delivers enterprise features that may justify the cost for complex organizations
Remember that the true cost extends beyond the monthly subscription to include development time, maintenance requirements, and the flexibility to adapt as your project evolves. When evaluating these headless CMS options, consider how their pricing models align with your long-term content infrastructure strategy and JAMstack architecture plans.
By carefully assessing both immediate costs and future scalability needs, you can select a content management solution that supports your development goals without unnecessary financial burden.