
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's hyper-competitive SaaS landscape, determining the right pricing strategy can mean the difference between sustainable growth and stagnation. As executives navigate pricing decisions, three fundamental approaches consistently emerge: undercutting competitors, matching market rates, or establishing premium positioning. But which strategy truly delivers optimal results for SaaS businesses?
Recent data from OpenView Partners shows that pricing remains among the most overlooked yet high-impact levers in SaaS, with 52% of companies reporting they spend less than 10 hours on pricing strategy when launching new products. This disconnect can be costly - pricing strategy isn't a one-and-done decision, but rather a dynamic element requiring continuous refinement.
Let's examine each approach through a strategic lens to determine when each might serve your business objectives best.
Undercutting competitors certainly creates immediate market attention. Slack notably used this approach during its early growth phase, offering a free tier that dramatically undercut established enterprise communication tools while delivering superior usability.
Advantages:
Challenges:
According to research by Price Intelligently, a 1% improvement in pricing optimization can yield an 11.1% increase in profit - significantly more impact than similar improvements in acquisition or retention. This suggests that blindly undercutting without strategic purpose risks leaving substantial revenue on the table.
Jason Lemkin of SaaStr notes: "The challenge with being the low-price leader in SaaS isn't just lower revenues—it's that you'll likely have to provide the same basic level of support, success, and service as higher-priced alternatives."
Price matching represents a perceived "safe" middle ground, anchoring your pricing to established market rates.
Advantages:
Challenges:
According to Tomasz Tunguz of Redpoint Ventures, "Price matching works best when your product has reached feature parity with market leaders, but offers some other differentiated value - like superior customer service or implementation."
The core question becomes: if you're matching competitors' pricing while offering similar features, what compelling reason do customers have to switch to your solution?
Premium pricing strategies position your SaaS offering as the superior choice, with pricing that reflects exceptional value.
Advantages:
Challenges:
Perhaps no SaaS company demonstrates the premium approach better than Salesforce, which maintains premium pricing while achieving market leadership. Research by McKinsey found that companies emphasizing value-based pricing achieved 24% higher margins than those focusing primarily on competing with market prices.
Patrick Campbell, founder of ProfitWell, notes: "Premium pricing isn't about charging more; it's about aligning price with the unique value you deliver to specific customers who recognize that value."
The truth is that the "best" pricing approach depends on your specific business context. Consider these critical factors:
1. Market Maturity
2. Product Differentiation
Data from OpenView's Expansion SaaS Benchmark Report indicates companies with "much better" product differentiation achieve 28% higher net retention than those with "somewhat better" offerings. This suggests premium pricing becomes viable with truly superior differentiation.
3. Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)
Higher CAC necessitates higher average revenue per user (ARPU). According to Bessemer Venture Partners' State of the Cloud Report, efficient growth companies maintain a CAC to LTV ratio of at least 3:1, requiring pricing strategies that support sustainable unit economics.
4. Competitive Density
Markets with numerous alternatives often face price compression, while those with few options allow greater pricing flexibility.
Many successful SaaS companies employ hybrid pricing strategies:
Tiered Value Pricing
HubSpot exemplifies this approach with pricing tiers that undercut enterprise alternatives at entry-level, match mid-market solutions in professional tiers, and command premium prices for enterprise features.
Penetration to Premium
Zoom initially gained market share through freemium and competitive pricing before gradually raising prices as their platform became essential infrastructure.
Value-Feature Alignment
Monday.com offers pricing aligned to specific value metrics that matter to different customer segments, allowing them to serve multiple price sensitivities while maintaining strong margins.
As you evaluate your pricing approach, remember that the most successful SaaS companies view pricing as an ongoing optimization process rather than a static decision. Data from Simon-Kucher & Partners indicates that companies conducting regular price optimizations (at least yearly) grow 30% faster than those with static pricing.
The true answer to "undercut, match, or premium" isn't selecting one strategy but understanding when each approach serves your strategic goals. The most effective pricing strategies reflect a deep understanding of:
In today's SaaS environment, the winners don't blindly follow pricing formulas but create pricing structures that reinforce their market positioning while delivering sustainable economics.
What's your pricing telling the market about your product?
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.