
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's digital transformation landscape, low-code platforms have emerged as powerful tools enabling organizations to develop applications with minimal traditional coding. Perhaps the most significant shift these platforms have catalyzed is the rise of "citizen developers"—business users who can create functional applications despite lacking formal programming backgrounds. As the low-code market continues its explosive growth—projected to reach $187.0 billion by 2030 according to Grand View Research—platform providers face a critical question: How do you effectively monetize this expanding user base while delivering value across diverse organizational needs?
Before diving into pricing models, it's essential to understand the fundamental value citizen developers bring to organizations:
According to Gartner, by 2025, 70% of new applications developed by enterprises will use low-code or no-code technologies, up from less than 25% in 2020. This shift represents a massive opportunity for platform providers who can align their pricing strategies with this transformation.
The most straightforward approach involves charging per user (typically monthly or annually). This model generally divides users into different categories:
Real-world example: Mendix offers tiered pricing with dedicated tiers for professional developers and citizen developers. Their pricing recognizes the different requirements and capabilities of these distinct user groups.
Strategic consideration: While user-based pricing provides predictable revenue, it can discourage adoption if organizations need to carefully manage license allocations. This can potentially limit the viral growth of citizen development initiatives.
This model charges based on the number of applications built and deployed on the platform.
Real-world example: OutSystems structures some of its pricing around application packages, allowing organizations to deploy a specified number of applications for a set fee.
Strategic consideration: This approach allows organizations to expand their citizen developer base without immediate cost implications, but it may limit innovation if teams become hesitant to create new applications due to cost concerns.
Rather than fixed fees, this model charges based on actual platform usage metrics such as:
Real-world example: Microsoft Power Platform incorporates consumption-based elements in its pricing, with certain operations and advanced connections incurring additional costs based on usage volume.
Strategic consideration: This approach aligns costs with actual value derived but can introduce unpredictability into budgeting processes.
This increasingly popular approach creates differentiated feature sets at various price points:
Real-world example: Appian offers tiered pricing that scales from small teams to enterprise-wide deployment, with increasing capabilities at each level.
According to Forrester Research, tiered models have shown particularly strong adoption rates, with 68% of successful low-code platforms implementing some form of value-based tier pricing.
The most successful low-code platforms recognize that citizen developer adoption follows network effects—value increases as more users join the ecosystem. Strategic elements that support this include:
According to a recent McKinsey study, platforms that offer frictionless entry points see 3.5x higher adoption rates in the first year compared to those with high initial barriers.
While initial adoption may begin with individual citizen developers, sustainable growth requires clear paths for enterprise-wide scaling:
Forward-thinking low-code providers recognize that citizen developers exist within broader ecosystems:
Salesforce's AppExchange demonstrates the potential of this approach, generating billions in ecosystem revenue beyond direct platform fees.
The most sophisticated pricing strategies for low-code platforms recognize the fundamental tension: maximizing accessibility for citizen developers while ensuring sustainable revenue growth.
Microsoft's approach to the Power Platform illustrates this balance. The company offers:
This strategy has helped Power Platform reach over 15 million monthly active users while maintaining strong revenue growth—reported at over 72% year-over-year in recent quarters.
As the market matures, several pricing innovations are emerging:
Rather than charging for access or usage, some platforms are experimenting with fees tied to measurable business outcomes—for example, a percentage of cost savings or revenue generated through applications.
Recognizing different value propositions across sectors, vendors are creating specialized industry bundles combining targeted templates, connectors, and pricing models for sectors like healthcare, financial services, or manufacturing.
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into low-code platforms, new premium tiers are emerging based on AI capabilities—from basic process automation to advanced predictive modeling.
In the rapidly evolving low-code market, pricing strategy has emerged as a critical competitive differentiator. Platforms that successfully monetize citizen developers will balance several key factors:
For executive decision-makers evaluating low-code platforms, understanding these pricing strategies provides valuable context for assessing not just current costs, but the long-term economic relationship with platform providers as citizen development initiatives scale.
The most successful low-code platforms will view pricing not simply as a revenue mechanism, but as a strategic tool to drive adoption, expand use cases, and ultimately deliver transformative value through citizen development.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.