.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
A mid-market SaaS company increased ARR by 25% in one quarter by restructuring their three-tier pricing model, introducing usage-based components for power users, and implementing value metric pricing aligned to customer outcomes—resulting in higher average contract values and reduced churn among enterprise segments.
This pricing experiment case study breaks down exactly how they did it, the internal resistance they overcame, and the tactical playbook you can use to replicate their increasing ARR strategy.
Executive Summary: The 25% ARR Growth Framework
The company at the center of this case study is a mid-market B2B SaaS platform serving operations teams at manufacturing companies. Before the experiment, they had achieved solid product-market fit with an $8M ARR baseline—but growth had plateaued.
Key metrics transformation:
- Before: 2-3% month-over-month ARR growth
- After: $2M additional ARR in 90 days (25% increase)
- Timeline: 12 weeks from hypothesis to full rollout
The core pricing changes implemented included transitioning from a rigid three-tier model to a four-tier hybrid structure, introducing usage-based pricing for power users, and realigning their value metric from per-seat to outcome-based pricing tied to operational efficiency gains.
The Problem: Stagnant Growth Despite Strong Product-Market Fit
Despite strong NPS scores and healthy retention, the company faced a frustrating reality: month-over-month ARR growth had hovered between 2-3% for six consecutive quarters.
Customer feedback revealed the root cause. Exit interviews and renewal conversations consistently surfaced pricing-value misalignment. Small teams felt they were overpaying for features they didn't use, while enterprise customers consuming 10x the platform resources paid the same flat rate as mid-market accounts.
"We kept hearing the same thing," recalls the company's VP of Revenue. "Customers loved the product but couldn't justify the cost to their CFO. Meanwhile, our power users were getting incredible ROI and would have paid significantly more."
Competitive pressure compounded the problem. Three major competitors had shifted to consumption-based models, making the company's flat-rate pricing feel outdated and inflexible during sales conversations.
The Hypothesis: Testing Value Metric Pricing
The revenue team hypothesized that realigning pricing to customer value delivery—rather than arbitrary feature bundles—would unlock both acquisition and expansion revenue.
Identifying the right value metric required answering a fundamental question: What do customers actually pay for? Through customer segmentation and willingness-to-pay analysis using tools like ProfitWell and Pendo analytics, they discovered that customers correlated value not with seats or features, but with operational workflows processed through the platform.
The research phase involved:
- Interviewing 45 customers across all segments
- Analyzing usage data to identify consumption patterns
- Running Van Westendorp pricing sensitivity surveys
- Mapping customer outcomes to pricing tiers
Success criteria for the experiment:
- 20%+ increase in new customer ACV
- Neutral or positive impact on conversion rates
- Less than 5% increase in churn during transition
Experiment Design and A/B Test Setup
The team structured a controlled experiment with clear parameters:
Control group: New prospects received the existing three-tier pricing (Basic, Professional, Enterprise) with per-seat pricing.
Test group: New prospects received the redesigned four-tier model with hybrid pricing—base platform fee plus usage-based components tied to workflows processed.
The new architecture introduced a "Growth" tier between Professional and Enterprise, specifically designed to capture mid-market customers who previously churned due to sticker shock when jumping to Enterprise pricing.
Implementation: The 90-Day Execution Plan
Weeks 1-2: Internal alignment and sales enablement
Before any customer-facing changes, the team invested heavily in internal alignment. This included executive buy-in sessions, sales team training on value-based selling, and updated Salesforce CPQ configurations to support the new pricing model.
Weeks 3-6: Soft launch to new customers only
The test group pricing launched exclusively to new inbound leads. This protected existing customer relationships while generating clean data on conversion impact.
Weeks 7-12: Expansion to existing customer base
With positive early signals, the team rolled out the new pricing to existing customers at renewal, implementing a grandfathering strategy that honored current rates for 12 months while offering incentives to migrate early.
Overcoming Internal Resistance and Sales Objections
The biggest obstacle wasn't customers—it was the sales team.
"Our AEs were terrified," the VP of Revenue admitted. "They'd spent years selling the old model. The most common objection was: 'This is too complicated. Customers want simple pricing.'"
The team addressed this through:
- Value-based conversation training: Two half-day workshops teaching reps to lead with ROI rather than feature comparisons
- New positioning materials: Updated pitch decks, battle cards, and a customer-facing ROI calculator built in Google Sheets
- Incentive alignment: Temporarily increasing commission rates on new-model deals to encourage adoption
Red Flags to Avoid When Running Pricing Experiments
- Launching new pricing without sales team buy-in (expect sabotage)
- Testing on existing customers before validating with new prospects
- Changing too many variables simultaneously (price, packaging, AND value metric)
- Skipping the grandfathering strategy for loyal customers
- Measuring success before allowing a full sales cycle to complete
Results: Breaking Down the 25% ARR Increase
After 90 days, the results exceeded every success criterion:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|--------|--------|-------|--------|
| New Customer ACV | $18,000 | $24,300 | +35% |
| Expansion Revenue (Quarterly) | $400K | $560K | +40% |
| Enterprise Churn (Annual) | 8% | 4% | -50% |
| Total ARR Impact | — | $2M | +25% |
"The numbers speak for themselves," said the CEO. "But what surprised us most was how the pricing change clarified our entire go-to-market strategy. We finally understood who our best customers were and how to find more of them."
Unexpected Benefits Beyond ARR Growth
Beyond the direct revenue impact, the pricing experiment delivered strategic advantages:
Improved customer segmentation and ICP clarity: Usage-based data revealed that customers processing 500+ workflows monthly had 3x higher retention. This insight reshaped marketing targeting and sales qualification criteria.
Faster sales cycles: Average days-to-close dropped from 47 to 35 days. The ROI calculator and transparent value-based pricing reduced negotiation friction and accelerated procurement approval.
Key Lessons and Tactical Takeaways for Your Pricing Strategy
This pricing experiment case study reinforces several SaaS growth tactics applicable across industries:
1. Start with customer research, not competitor analysis. The winning value metric emerged from customer interviews, not competitor benchmarking. What customers value and what competitors charge are different questions.
2. Test incrementally before company-wide rollout. The soft launch to new customers only protected $8M in existing ARR while generating proof points for broader adoption.
3. Align pricing changes with product value delivery. Usage-based components only worked because the platform could accurately track and report on workflows processed. Ensure your billing infrastructure supports your pricing ambitions.
4. Invest in change management and sales enablement. The pricing model was only as good as the team's ability to sell it. Training and tools were non-negotiable investments.
Replicating This Success: Your 30-Day Action Plan
Ready to test your own pricing hypothesis? Here's a condensed framework:
Week 1: Audit current pricing against customer value delivery
- Pull usage data by customer segment
- Identify gaps between price paid and value received
- Document common pricing objections from sales calls
Weeks 2-3: Conduct willingness-to-pay research with top 20% of customers
- Schedule 15-20 customer interviews
- Run pricing sensitivity surveys
- Analyze expansion revenue patterns for value metric clues
Week 4: Design hypothesis and experiment framework
- Define test and control groups
- Set success criteria with specific thresholds
- Build sales enablement materials and configure CPQ systems
The path from flat growth to 25% ARR increase isn't magic—it's methodology. This increasing ARR strategy worked because it was grounded in customer research, executed with discipline, and supported by organizational change management.
Download our Pricing Experiment Playbook to access the complete framework, customer research templates, and ROI calculator used in this case study.