
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
In today's highly competitive SaaS landscape, companies are constantly seeking effective go-to-market strategies that can drive sustainable growth. Product-led growth (PLG) has emerged as a dominant approach, with companies like Slack, Dropbox, and Zoom demonstrating its potential. Simultaneously, the open core business model—offering a free open-source version with paid premium features—has gained traction among developer-focused companies.
But can these two approaches work together effectively? Is it possible to execute a successful product-led growth strategy while maintaining an open core model? Let's explore this complex but potentially powerful combination.
Product-led growth is a go-to-market strategy that positions your product as the primary driver of customer acquisition, conversion, and expansion. Instead of relying heavily on sales-led approaches, PLG leverages the product experience itself to grow the business. Users typically discover, try, and adopt the product through self-service experiences before any sales interaction occurs.
Key characteristics of successful PLG strategies include:
According to OpenView Partners' 2022 Product Benchmarks Report, PLG companies have seen 2x higher revenue growth rates compared to their sales-led counterparts, with significantly lower customer acquisition costs.
Open core represents a hybrid approach between fully open-source and proprietary software. With this model:
Notable companies successfully employing open core include GitLab, Elastic, HashiCorp, and MongoDB. This approach allows companies to benefit from community development while maintaining sustainable revenue streams.
When thoughtfully implemented, PLG and open core can create a powerful synergistic effect:
The open source core serves as an organic freemium offering, allowing users to experience the product's core value without friction. This aligns perfectly with PLG's emphasis on self-service adoption.
"The open core model gives you a natural entry point for bottom-up adoption," explains Joseph Jacks, founder of OSS Capital. "Developers can freely use, modify, and even contribute to the core product before becoming paying customers."
Open source projects naturally build communities around them. These communities become powerful growth engines through:
This community-driven growth mechanism complements the viral adoption patterns typical in successful PLG strategies.
For developer-focused products, open source brings inherent credibility. Developers can inspect the code, verify security practices, and understand exactly how the product works—building trust that accelerates adoption.
According to GitHub's 2021 Open Source Survey, 72% of developers consider a project's open source status when evaluating new tools, with transparency and trust cited as primary motivators.
Despite the potential benefits, several significant challenges arise when combining these approaches:
Perhaps the most critical challenge is finding the right balance between what's free (open source) and what's paid. Make too much available for free, and monetization becomes difficult. Restrict too much behind paywalls, and you lose the benefits of open source adoption.
"Companies often struggle with deciding what features belong in the open core versus the proprietary extensions," notes Stephen O'Grady, Principal Analyst at RedMonk. "This tension is amplified when you're also trying to optimize for self-service adoption."
In a traditional PLG model, you can carefully design every step of the user journey. With open core, users may interact with your product through various channels outside your direct control—GitHub repositories, community forums, third-party extensions, or self-hosted instances.
This makes it harder to:
Open source communities value transparency and typically resist heavy commercialization efforts. Aggressive upselling or feature gating can create community backlash.
Elastic's licensing changes in 2021 illustrated this challenge, creating significant community discussion and even spawning competing forks of their projects.
Companies that successfully combine these approaches follow several key principles:
Successful open core PLG companies clearly define what value belongs in the open source core versus the commercial offering. This boundary should follow natural use cases rather than arbitrary feature limitations.
HashiCorp provides an excellent example with products like Terraform, where the open source tool handles core infrastructure-as-code functionality, while the enterprise version adds collaboration, governance, and policy features that larger teams naturally need.
Map out how users progress from open source users to paying customers with deliberate thought:
GitLab excels at this, using their open source core as an entry point while creating natural upsell opportunities around enterprise needs like security, compliance, and advanced DevOps capabilities.
To execute PLG effectively, you need visibility into user behavior. This becomes more complex with open core, as many users may self-host or use the product outside your direct monitoring.
Consider implementing:
The most successful open core PLG companies create seamless bridges between self-service adoption and enterprise expansion:
Confluent (built around Apache Kafka) demonstrates this approach effectively, allowing individual developers to start with open source Kafka while providing a clear path to their managed cloud offering as needs scale.
Several companies have successfully executed product-led growth strategies while maintaining open core models:
GitLab has grown from an open source project to a public company valued at billions by creating natural expansion paths from their open source core to their Ultimate tier, focusing on enterprise features like security scanning, compliance, and advanced DevOps capabilities.
Grafana Labs built their observability platform on open source foundations while creating a seamless cloud offering that makes scaling and managing their tools significantly easier, resulting in natural self-service to paid conversion.
Kong transformed from an open source API gateway to a comprehensive API management platform through carefully designed tiers that preserve developer experience while adding enterprise value.
Combining product-led growth with an open core model can be powerful but isn't suitable for every SaaS business. Consider this approach if:
Successfully executing product-led growth with an open core model requires thoughtful balance between openness and commercialization, community and business interests. When done right, this combination leverages the best aspects of both approaches—the frictionless adoption and organic growth of PLG with the transparency, trust, and community benefits of open source.
For companies willing to invest in finding this balance, the rewards can be substantial: lower customer acquisition costs, stronger community advocacy, and sustainable growth driven by genuine product value rather than sales pressure.
The key lies in respecting both the principles of product-led growth and the expectations of open source communities while creating clear, value-based paths to monetization that feel natural rather than extractive.
Is your organization exploring a product-led growth strategy with an open core model? Start by clearly defining where your open/paid boundary should lie based on distinct user needs, then design conversion paths that honor both the user experience an

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.