.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
In the competitive landscape of software development, pricing strategies can make or break a developer platform. Usage-based pricing (also known as consumption pricing) has emerged as a particularly intriguing model for developer-focused products. But the question remains: can a developer platform truly thrive with a pure usage-based pricing approach, or is a hybrid model necessary for sustainable growth?
What Is Usage-Based Pricing and Why Are Developers Drawn to It?
Usage-based pricing is straightforward in concept: customers pay only for what they use. Whether it's API calls, compute resources, or storage capacity, this model directly ties cost to consumption. For developers, this approach offers compelling advantages:
- Low barrier to entry: Developers can start with minimal commitment, often even for free
- Scalability: Costs scale in proportion to usage, aligning with business growth
- Cost efficiency: Organizations only pay for actual value received
- Transparency: Clear visibility into what drives costs
According to OpenView Partners' 2022 SaaS Benchmarks report, companies with usage-based pricing models grew revenue 38% faster than their counterparts with traditional subscription models. This explains why platforms like AWS, Twilio, and Stripe have leaned heavily into this approach.
The Developer Platform Landscape: Who's Winning with Usage-Based Models?
Several successful developer platforms have built their empires largely on usage-based pricing:
Stripe has become synonymous with payment processing, charging a percentage per transaction. Their model scales perfectly with customer success—Stripe only makes money when their customers make money.
Twilio pioneered the API-first approach with consumption pricing, charging per message, call, or authentication. This allowed developers to experiment freely before committing to larger implementations.
MongoDB Atlas offers a database platform where pricing scales with storage, compute, and data transfer usage, enabling developers to start small and scale as their applications grow.
The common thread? These platforms make it extremely easy to get started, sometimes with generous free tiers, and then capture increasing revenue as customer usage grows.
The Hidden Challenges of Pure Usage-Based Pricing
Despite its appeal, relying solely on usage-based pricing presents significant challenges:
Revenue Predictability Issues
For platform providers, usage-based models create inherent unpredictability in revenue forecasting. When customers can dial usage up or down at will, predicting cash flow becomes complicated. According to Bessemer Venture Partners, this revenue volatility can make it difficult to plan for growth and satisfy investors who prefer predictable SaaS metrics.
The "Success Gap" Problem
A less discussed challenge is what I call the "success gap." Early-stage customers may love your pay-as-you-go model, but as they scale, their growing bill can trigger procurement reviews and competitive evaluations. According to a ProfitWell study, 32% of companies on pure usage-based pricing experienced customers switching to competitors offering fixed pricing at scale.
Development and Infrastructure Complexity
Building systems to accurately measure, report, and bill based on usage metrics requires significant engineering investment. These systems must be fault-tolerant and accurate—errors in usage tracking directly impact your revenue and customer trust.
Finding Balance: Hybrid Approaches That Work
Many successful developer platforms have evolved toward hybrid pricing models that combine usage-based elements with subscription components:
GitHub offers tiered subscriptions with included usage allowances, then charges for additional consumption beyond those thresholds.
Datadog combines a per-user subscription fee with usage-based charges for data ingestion and retention, providing both predictable base revenue and upside from growing usage.
Snowflake uses a clever credit system where customers purchase credits through subscriptions, then consume those credits based on actual usage—marrying commitment with flexibility.
Best Practices for Implementing Usage-Based Pricing for Developer Platforms
If you're considering a usage-based approach for your developer platform, consider these strategies:
1. Align Pricing with Clear Value Metrics
Choose consumption metrics that directly correlate with the value customers receive. API calls alone might not be meaningful, but "successful transactions processed" or "hours of computing time saved" can better reflect actual value delivered.
2. Implement Usage Caps and Predictability Features
Even within a usage model, offering caps, alerts, and budget controls helps customers manage costs. According to Paddle's SaaS pricing survey, 78% of customers prefer having maximum spend limits on usage-based services.
3. Consider a "Floor and Ceiling" Approach
Many successful platforms implement minimum commitments to ensure baseline revenue while also offering volume discounts that effectively create pricing ceilings, making large-scale usage more economical for customers.
4. Provide Migration Paths as Customers Mature
As startups become enterprises, their procurement preferences change. Offering the ability to convert from pure usage to commitments with favorable terms keeps customers from looking elsewhere as they scale.
The Future: Evolving Beyond Simple Usage-Based Models
The next generation of developer platforms appears to be moving toward more sophisticated approaches:
- Outcome-based pricing: Charging based on business results rather than technical usage
- Value-sharing models: Participating in the upside when customer applications succeed
- Usage-based with guaranteed SLAs: Combining consumption pricing with performance guarantees
Conclusion: Usage-Based Pricing Works Best as Part of a Thoughtful Strategy
Can you build a successful developer platform on usage-based pricing alone? The evidence suggests that pure usage-based models work exceptionally well for initial adoption and developer love, but most maturing platforms evolve toward hybrid approaches to balance growth, predictability, and customer needs.
The most successful developer platforms don't view pricing as static but rather as a strategic tool that evolves with their market position and customer base. They start with low-friction usage-based components to drive adoption, then introduce commitment options to improve predictability as they—and their customers—scale.
For founders and product leaders building developer platforms today, the question isn't whether to use usage-based pricing, but rather how to implement it within a comprehensive pricing strategy that can adapt as your platform grows and your customer needs mature.