
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.
Many SaaS products are underpriced when compared to the value they deliver, customer willingness to pay, and market benchmarks. You can diagnose underpricing by checking for signs like consistently high win rates, persistent discounting pressure from your own team (but not from customers), fast adoption with lagging revenue growth, and low price sensitivity in renewal cycles—and then use structured experiments to move prices up while managing risk and churn.
This guide walks through how to diagnose underpricing, quantify the upside, and adjust your SaaS pricing strategy with low-risk experiments.
In SaaS, underpricing doesn’t just mean “cheaper than competitors.” You’re underpriced when:
Competitive pricing can still be underpricing if the entire category is too cheap relative to value.
Underpricing quietly erodes the fundamentals that drive your valuation:
Lower LTV
If you’re charging $80 where the market will support $120, you’re leaving 50% LTV on the table before you even think about churn or expansion.
Slower CAC payback
With the same CAC and lower ACV, your CAC payback period stretches. That constrains paid acquisition, sales hiring, and product investment.
Lower valuation multiples
Investors look at net revenue retention (NRR), ARPU/ASP, and margin. Underpricing depresses all three, even if logo growth looks great.
Strategic constraints
You end up under-funding roadmap, support, and brand—then lose to better-monetized competitors who can outspend you.
Underpricing feels “safe” in the short term but is often more dangerous than being slightly expensive.
Here’s a checklist of concrete signals across commercial, product, and financial metrics that your SaaS pricing may be too low.
Win rates are abnormally high
For competitive deals, win rates >60–70% can be a yellow flag.
If every competitor comparison ends with “you’re a no-brainer on price,” you’re likely underpriced.
Discounts mostly come from your side, not customers
Reps offer discounts preemptively to “avoid losing the deal,” even when prospects didn’t ask.
Approved discount levels are high and common (e.g., 20–30%+ “standard discount”).
Sales objections focus on product gaps, not price
You rarely hear: “You’re too expensive.”
Instead you hear: “We’re not ready yet,” “We need this feature,” or “We don’t have a use case for all of this.” Low price may be masking value misalignment.
Procurement sails through
Enterprise deals get approved suspiciously quickly.
You rarely get pushed into long negotiation cycles over price or legal.
High NPS / CSAT with no price complaints
Customers are happy, use the product heavily, and no one mentions price as a trade-off.
In interviews, they say: “Oh, it’s not expensive at all,” or “Honestly, it’s a rounding error.”
High product adoption and engagement vs. low revenue per account
Accounts with dozens or hundreds of active users but paying what looks like a small-business bill.
Heavy usage that doesn’t scale revenue (no seats, usage, or value metrics tied to price).
Zero friction in renewals
Renewal conversations are focused entirely on features or roadmap.
Multi-year renewals are easy to close without concessions, suggesting you have more pricing power than you’re using.
Your ARPU/ASP is well below peers
Similar ICP, use cases, and deployment complexity—but you’re charging 30–50% less than competitors.
Benchmark across: public comps, sales intel, analyst reports, and customer anecdotes.
CAC payback is longer than it should be for your segment
For mid-market/enterprise: payback >18–24 months often indicates room for higher pricing or better packaging.
For SMB/PLG: if you invest in growth but can’t break even on CAC in 12 months, your price or monetization model may be off.
Low expansion revenue despite strong adoption
NRR is stuck at 100–105% even though usage grows strongly within accounts.
No clear value metric to capture growth in customer value, so revenue stays flat.
If you’re nodding “yes” to several of these, there’s a good chance your SaaS is underpriced.
Many SaaS companies still set price as:
Cost of infrastructure + support + a margin we’re comfortable with
or
What feels “reasonable” for our persona
Problems with this:
Value-based pricing flips this: price is linked to ROI and customer willingness to pay, not your costs.
There’s a common anxiety loop:
So prices stay low, even as product value and brand trust grow. Meanwhile:
Ironically, slightly higher prices often improve perceived value and attract more serious buyers.
Typical pattern:
If you’ve added major capabilities (automation, analytics, security, integrations) or moved upmarket but your list price hasn’t meaningfully changed, you’re almost certainly underpriced.
Use this three-step assessment as a quick SaaS pricing checklist.
For your core segments, answer:
What business outcome do we drive?
Revenue (e.g., +X% conversion, +Y% upsell)
Cost savings (e.g., reduce manual work, headcount saved)
Risk reduction (e.g., compliance, errors, downtime)
Can we estimate ROI in dollars?
Example:
Your tool saves 10 hours/month for a team at an average loaded cost of $80/hour.
That’s $800/month saved.
If you charge $150/month, that’s >5x ROI—many teams would still buy at $250–300.
If ROI is consistently 5–10x+ at current pricing, especially for mid-market/enterprise, you probably have room to move up.
Collect:
Ask:
Being the cheapest can work as a deliberate strategy; unintentionally being the cheapest is usually underpricing.
Set up 10–20 quick conversations with a mix of:
Ask questions like:
Themes to watch:
Once you suspect underpricing, build a quick business case.
Create a simple model:
Example:
Run similar scenarios for:
Often, modest price increases can fund critical hires or initiatives.
Not all customers are equal in pricing sensitivity. Segment by:
You’ll often find:
This segmentation tells you where to focus first for low-risk upside.
Here are practical experiments you can run next quarter to correct underpricing without blowing up growth.
The simplest low-risk move:
Benefits:
You can later:
If your volumes allow it:
Examples:
Track:
If the differences are minimal in performance but higher in revenue, you’ve found pricing power.
If you’re underpriced and don’t scale revenue with usage, fix the model, not just the sticker.
Moves to consider:
Start by:
This is often where the biggest long-term monetization upside lies.
Pricing strategy is half math, half messaging. How you communicate matters as much as what you change.
When notifying customers:
Lead with value, not the percentage increase:
“Over the last 18 months, we’ve shipped X, Y, Z…”
“We’ve invested in better uptime, security, and support.”
Be transparent about why:
“We’re aligning pricing with the value our customers tell us they’re getting.”
“This allows us to continue investing in A, B, and C that you’ve requested.”
Use specific, relevant examples:
“You now automate [X tasks] that used to take [Y hours], and we’ve added [key features] without changing price until now.”
To reduce churn risk:
Tactical tips:
Handled well, price changes can actually strengthen trust, not break it.
Fixing underpricing once is good. Building a habit of price optimization is how you avoid drifting back into it.
Make pricing someone’s job:
Responsibilities:
Set a regular cadence:
Key metrics to track:
This doesn’t mean raising price every year. It means continuously asking:
If you see signs of underpricing in your SaaS and want a structured, low-risk plan to correct it, book a pricing review to identify underpricing and model safe price increases for your SaaS.

Join companies like Zoom, DocuSign, and Twilio using our systematic pricing approach to increase revenue by 12-40% year-over-year.