.png)
Frameworks, core principles and top case studies for SaaS pricing, learnt and refined over 28+ years of SaaS-monetization experience.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Introduction
The supply chain landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation through the emergence of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Unlike traditional AI tools that simply analyze data or automate repetitive tasks, agentic AI possesses the ability to make autonomous decisions, learn from outcomes, and continuously optimize processes without human intervention. For SaaS executives navigating this shifting terrain, understanding the relationship between the efficiency gains these systems promise and their pricing structures is critical for strategic planning and competitive positioning.
Understanding Agentic AI in Supply Chain Operations
Agentic AI represents a paradigm shift from reactive to proactive supply chain management. These autonomous systems can forecast demand fluctuations, reroute shipments in real-time, negotiate with suppliers, and even self-correct when faced with disruptions—all while operating within predefined parameters set by human managers.
According to research from McKinsey, companies implementing advanced AI solutions in their supply chains have seen inventory reductions of 20-50%, logistics cost decreases of 15-30%, and service level improvements of up to 65%. These efficiency gains are substantial, but they come with important considerations regarding cost structures and pricing models.
The Efficiency Proposition: How Agentic AI Creates Value
Demand Forecasting and Inventory Optimization
Agentic AI systems excel at processing vast amounts of historical and real-time data to predict future demand patterns with unprecedented accuracy. A 2023 study by Gartner found that AI-driven forecasting systems reduce forecast errors by an average of 30-40% compared to traditional methods.
Walmart, for instance, implemented an intelligent forecasting system that reduced inventory carrying costs by $2.9 billion while simultaneously improving in-stock availability. The system continuously learns from its performance, becoming more accurate with each cycle.
Autonomous Logistics Management
Beyond forecasting, agentic AI is revolutionizing logistics execution. These systems can:
- Dynamically optimize routing based on real-time conditions
- Coordinate multi-modal transportation seamlessly
- Predict and mitigate potential disruptions before they occur
- Automatically adjust warehouse staffing based on anticipated workload
Maersk, the global shipping giant, deployed an AI system that autonomously manages container positioning, reducing empty container movements by 15% and saving approximately $100 million annually, according to their 2022 sustainability report.
Supplier Relationship Management
Perhaps most revolutionary is agentic AI's capability to actively manage supplier relationships. These systems can:
- Continuously monitor supplier performance
- Negotiate price adjustments based on market conditions
- Automatically diversify sourcing when risk triggers are detected
- Optimize payment timing to maximize working capital
The Fixed Fee Pricing Dilemma
While the efficiency gains are compelling, they create an interesting challenge in the pricing of agentic AI solutions. Most enterprise software has historically followed either:
- Fixed fee models (annual subscriptions based on company size or users)
- Volume-based pricing (tied to transaction volume or data processed)
- Value-based pricing (capturing a percentage of demonstrated savings)
Agentic AI creates a paradox for traditional fixed fee models: as the system becomes more efficient, it delivers increasing value while potentially processing fewer transactions or requiring less computational resources.
The Efficiency Paradox
Consider a logistics optimization AI that initially saves a company $5 million annually for a fixed subscription of $500,000—a clear 10:1 ROI. As the system improves, it might increase savings to $8 million without any increase in subscription costs, improving the ROI to 16:1.
While beneficial for the customer, this creates several challenges for the SaaS provider:
- Value Capture Gap: The increasing value created isn't reflected in revenue growth
- Growth Ceiling: Subscription revenue remains flat even as the product improves
- Misaligned Incentives: The provider has limited financial motivation to drive further efficiency gains
According to a recent Deloitte survey, 62% of SaaS executives report challenges in capturing the full value of their AI solutions through traditional pricing models.
Emerging Pricing Models for Agentic AI Solutions
Forward-thinking SaaS executives are exploring innovative pricing approaches that better align with the value dynamics of agentic AI:
Outcome-Based Pricing
Rather than charging a fixed fee, some providers are adopting models where they receive a percentage of verified cost savings or efficiency gains. This approach directly ties revenue to the value delivered.
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software) has pioneered this approach with select enterprise customers, charging based on inventory reduction targets and supply chain performance improvements rather than traditional licensing fees.
Tiered Autonomy Pricing
Another approach segments pricing based on the level of autonomy granted to the AI system:
- Basic Tier: AI provides recommendations for human approval
- Advanced Tier: AI autonomously handles routine decisions, escalating only exceptions
- Full Autonomy Tier: AI manages the entire process with minimal human oversight
Each increasing level of autonomy comes with a higher fixed fee, reflecting the additional value and reduced human labor.
Hybrid Models
The most sophisticated approach combines fixed fees with performance-based components:
- Base subscription covering core functionality and maintenance
- Performance bonuses tied to specific efficiency metrics
- Option for customers to "buy up" to higher autonomy levels as confidence grows
This approach provides stability for the vendor while ensuring alignment with customer success.
Implementation Considerations for Executives
When evaluating agentic AI for supply chain operations, executives should consider several factors beyond the technology itself:
ROI Measurement Framework
Establish a clear methodology for measuring efficiency gains before implementation. This should include:
- Baseline performance metrics for key processes
- Direct cost savings (labor, inventory, transportation)
- Indirect benefits (improved service levels, faster response times)
- Risk reduction and resilience improvements
Vendor Alignment
Assess how well the vendor's pricing model aligns with your expected benefits:
- Does the pricing scale appropriately with your organization's size and complexity?
- Are there mechanisms to share in the upside of exceptional performance?
- Does the contract provide flexibility as your needs evolve?
Change Management Requirements
Agentic AI fundamentally changes how teams work, requiring:
- Clear governance defining AI authority boundaries
- Training for staff to effectively supervise autonomous systems
- Process redesign to capitalize on new capabilities
- Cultural shifts toward human-AI collaboration
Conclusion
Agentic AI represents a step-change in supply chain management capability, offering unprecedented efficiency gains across forecasting, logistics, and supplier management. However, traditional fixed fee pricing models may not adequately capture or incentivize these improvements.
Forward-thinking SaaS executives should evaluate innovative pricing structures that align vendor success with customer outcomes. Whether through outcome-based models, tiered autonomy pricing, or hybrid approaches, the goal should be creating win-win partnerships where both parties benefit from continuous improvement.
As the market matures, we can expect further innovation in how these solutions are packaged and priced. The most successful vendors will be those who can clearly articulate their value proposition in terms of efficiency gains while structuring deals that fairly distribute the considerable value these autonomous systems create.