Back to RankingsHow we score agents ↓

11x (Alice)

|
2023
|
$50M+

AI SDR agent that autonomously runs full outbound prospecting cycles from research to meeting booking.

Last Scored:
March 24, 2026
Visit website →
ZHA - Zero-Human Ability
L

Human sets the ICP and reviews booked meetings. Alice runs the full prospecting-to-booking cycle autonomously - the agent is the unit of production.

OD - Operational Domain
M

Multi-step within a single function (outbound sales development). Prospecting, researching, messaging, following up, and booking - stays within SDR scope.

O/C Curve - Output/Cost
Inflecting

The compute cost per outreach sequence is negligible. But the effective value ratio depends heavily on meeting quality and conversion rate. Reports suggest Alice needs 10K+ emails to produce meaningful results.

Monetization Potential
58
/100
Moderate-High
Pricing Fit
35
/100
Weak
Current Pricing

~$5,000/month ($60K/year), enterprise annual contracts.

Monetizely Pricing Critique

11x's pricing is anchored to a legitimate benchmark - the cost of a human SDR. At $60K/year, Alice is positioned as a cost-equivalent replacement. The problem: Alice replaces maybe 40% of an SDR's job at 100% of the cost. The AI SDR category went from a handful of players to 50+ in under two years. Competitors like Agent Frank ($499/mo) and AiSDR ($900/mo) offer overlapping capabilities at a fraction of 11x's price.

Monetizely Recommendation

Shift to hybrid: lower base + per-qualified-meeting kicker. Align incentives and create path to earn more from high-performing deployments.

Competitors
Agent Frank, AiSDR, Ava (Artisan), Regie.ai
About This Analysis

This page is part of Monetizely's Agentic AI Index - an independent research initiative that evaluates how well AI agents' pricing models capture their agentic value.

Who we are: Monetizely is a pricing strategy consultancy founded by former pricing leaders from Zoom, Twilio, and DocuSign. We have helped 28+ companies optimize their pricing for sustainable growth.

How we score: Each agent is evaluated on three dimensions - Zero-Human Ability (ZHA), Operational Domain (OD), and Output/Cost Curve (O/C) - using our Agentic Monetization Spectrum framework. Analysis combines LLM-assisted research with expert human review.

Why it matters: As AI agents move from tools to autonomous workers, the gap between the value they deliver and how they are priced creates both risk and opportunity. This index helps founders, investors, and pricing teams understand where that gap exists.

AMS Framework Glossary

The Agentic Monetization Spectrum (AMS) is Monetizely's framework for evaluating how well an AI agent's pricing captures its agentic value.

ZHA - Zero-Human Ability
How autonomously the agent operates. S = human does most work, M = shared, L = agent is the unit of production.
OD - Operational Domain
Breadth of the agent's scope. S = single task, M = multi-step within one function, L = cross-functional across domains.
Output/Cost (O/C) Curve  
Ratio of value delivered to compute cost. Linear = proportional, Inflecting = above linear but inconsistent, Exponential = massive value gap.
Pricing Fit
How well the agent's current pricing model captures its agentic value. Strong, Moderate, Partial, or Weak.

Disclaimer

This analysis is based on publicly available information, including company websites, press releases, published pricing pages, investor disclosures, and third-party reporting. All scores, ratings, and commentary reflect Monetizely's independent opinion using our proprietary Agentic Monetization Spectrum (AMS) methodology. This content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or business advice.

Monetizely has no commercial relationship with any of the companies analyzed in this index unless explicitly disclosed. The intent of this analysis is not to disparage any company, product, or pricing strategy, but to provide an objective evaluation of pricing-to-value alignment in the agentic AI market.

If you represent a company featured in this index and believe any information is inaccurate or outdated, or if you would like to request a re-evaluation, please contact us. We are committed to keeping this index accurate and fair, and welcome corrections and updated information.