Zoom’s Complexity of Pricing Structure Impacting Revenue

Zoom Video Communications was founded in 2011 by Eric Yuan, quickly established itself as a leading provider of video conferencing solutions. The company’s flagship product, Zoom Meetings, gained popularity for its user-friendly interface and reliable performance. As a result,  Zoom experienced rapid growth, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when remote work and virtual meetings became essential. By 2020, Zoom’s product portfolio had expanded significantly, including Zoom Video Webinars, Zoom Rooms, Zoom Phone, and numerous add-on packages.

Zoom Business Model

Zoom operates on a freemium model, offering a basic version of its services for free while charging for premium features and add-ons. This model includes various subscription plans catering to different customer segments, from individual users and small businesses to large enterprises. Revenue is generated primarily through subscription fees for these premium plans, complemented by sales of add-on packages that enhance core functionalities.

Challenge: Fast Growth Resulted in Pricing Complexity

Between 2014 and 2020, Zoom’s product portfolio and the associated features expanded rapidly. The company prioritized speed to market, introducing new functionalities primarily through add-on packages. While this approach allowed Zoom to quickly address market demands and stay ahead of competitors, it led to significant complexities:

  1. Product Overload: The number of add-ons available on the website exceeded 14, with many more offered through the enterprise sales channel. This proliferation made it challenging for customers to navigate the product offerings and understand the value propositions of each add-on. That negatively impacted user experience and online conversions.
  2. Pricing Structure: The focus on adding new features through add-ons resulted in a convoluted pricing structure. Customers found it difficult to determine the total cost of ownership and compare different plans, leading to confusion and decreased online conversions.
  3. Operational Complexity: Managing an extensive array of SKUs (Stock Keeping Units) exceeded 1000, escalating the costs and complexity of portfolio management. This hindered operational efficiency and scalability.

Zoom Challenge in Context of Market Trends

The challenges faced by Zoom were not unique but reflected broader trends in the SaaS market. Many SaaS companies experienced rapid growth and diversification of their product lines, leading to similar issues:

  1. Feature Bloat: To remain competitive, SaaS companies frequently added new features, sometimes at the expense of simplicity and user experience.
  2. Complex Pricing Models: As products became more sophisticated, pricing models often became complex, creating friction in the buying process.
  3. Operational Strain: Expanding product portfolios increased the burden on operations, making it difficult to manage and scale efficiently.

Zoom's Response

Recognizing the need for simplification, Zoom initiated a strategic review of its product portfolio and pricing structure. The company’s response focused on several key areas:

  1. Hiring a Pricing Operations Team: Zoom decided to establish a dedicated Pricing Operations team to tackle the complexity of their product offerings. The primary goal of this team was to streamline the product line-up by removing SKUs that generated low levels of revenue.
  2. Conjoint Studies: To better understand market preferences and optimize packaging, our team conducted a series of Conjoint studies. These studies were aimed at soliciting feedback on customer packaging preferences and willingness to pay. The insights gained allowed us to recognize what features are predominantly purchased together, and should be merged or bundled.
  3. Simplifying the Product Line-Up: Based on the Conjoint study results, Zoom we incorporated many add-ons into the main line-up packages. This consolidation reduced the number of separate add-ons and made the product offerings more straightforward.
  4. Leveraging Data Insights: The richness of the data provided by Conjoint was instrumental in this undertaking. Because of that data density, it was possible to accurately predict how re-packaging and reducing the number of options available to Customers will affect revenue. Shift from packages/add-ons that were to be removed to the alternatives was accurately quantified.
  5. Introducing Zoom One Bundle: As part of the new strategy, the Pricing team designed the "Zoom One" bundle. This bundle provided a simple way for customers to purchase multi-product combinations online, further simplifying the purchasing process and enhancing customer convenience.
  6. Operational Efficiency: By reducing the number of SKUs and simplifying the product line-up, Zoom improved its operational efficiency. This included better inventory management, reduced costs, and enhanced scalability.

Tactics

Implementing such a fundamental shift in packaging and pricing required several core elements to align successfully. The primary tactics employed by us were:

1. Data and Insights

Central to the success of this initiative was gathering accurate data and insights. As previously mentioned, conjoint studies played a crucial role in this process. To achieve high-quality results from these studies, it was essential to identify the right cohort of prospects and customers to test on. Additionally, ensuring the correct features and functionalities were tested was vital. Testing too few features would not yield meaningful conclusions, while testing too many could compromise data quality. Conjoint analysis allowed Zoom to predict revenue impacts accurately. Given Zoom's size, any change in pricing could have significant revenue implications, making precise predictions paramount.

2. Cross-Functional "Tiger Team"

Another critical tactic was establishing a cross-functional team known as the "Tiger Team." This team met weekly in the Pricing Forum meeting. Since pricing changes impact every team within the company, from Sales and Customer Care to Product, Engineering, Accounting, and Legal, strong communication and collaboration systems were essential. The Tiger Team ensured all departments were aligned and informed about the changes. A dedicated Project Manager oversaw the re-packaging project, coordinating a series of broad cross-functional meetings. Clarifying decision spaces and roles was also necessary to accelerate decision-making and maintain project momentum.

3. Iterative Testing

Testing was the final pillar of the project’s success. We conducted a series of iterative A/B online tests to validate the results of the conjoint studies. These tests also examined elements that could not be assessed through conjoint analysis, such as changes to website navigation and usability. This approach allowed us to refine the customer experience and ensure that the new pricing and packaging structures were effective and user-friendly.

These core elements ensured that Zoom’s strategic shift was based on robust data, effective teamwork, and continuous improvement through testing. By focusing on these areas, Zoom was able to navigate the complexities of pricing and packaging changes, ultimately driving better customer outcomes and operational efficiency.

Results

The Zoom lineup has been streamlined from an overdeveloped 5-item video product suite, which included 11 add-ons advertised online (with many more available through the sales team), to a new lineup that shifts the focus of monetization away from video conferencing.

Fig.1: Before 

You will see in the after state (see Figure 2 below) how the new design enhances the online channel, reducing confusion and making it easier for customers to navigate.

Fig.2: After 

Zoom Video Communications has reported various financial results for its different fiscal quarters in 2024 (Feb 2023-Jan 2024), reflecting on its overall performance, including the Zoom One bundle. Key highlights include:

Q4 FY2024 Financial Results

Zoom reported a total revenue of $1,146.5 million, showing a year-over-year increase of 2.6%. The Zoom One bundle significantly contributed to this growth by attracting large enterprise customers and driving a net dollar expansion rate of 115% among these customers.

Customer Growth

The Zoom One bundle has contributed to a 27% year-over-year growth in customers contributing more than $100,000 in trailing 12 months revenue. This has been pivotal in expanding its market reach.

Revenue Distribution

Enterprise revenue saw a significant increase, with the Zoom One bundle being a key product for attracting enterprise clients. This bundle includes comprehensive solutions such as Zoom Phone, Zoom Rooms, and other collaborative tools, which have been well-received by businesses.

These results underscore the importance of the Zoom One bundle in Zoom’s overall strategy to boost financial performance and customer engagement. Replacing a large selection of Add-Ons by bundled solution streamlined the sales process, and attracted new Enterprise and SMB Customers.

Conclusion

Zoom’s case demonstrates the importance of balancing innovation with simplicity. As companies grow and expand their product lines, it is crucial to periodically review and streamline offerings to ensure they remain user-friendly and operationally efficient.

By focusing on data-driven insights, cross-functional collaboration, and continuous testing, Zoom successfully navigated the complexities of product and pricing simplification, leading to improved customer experiences and scalable growth. Managed to transform a complex product landscape into a more streamlined and user-friendly offering.

This case study serves as a valuable example for other SaaS companies facing similar challenges in a rapidly evolving market.